[Platero-devel] Re: platero

[Carlos Acedo]

Javier Hernández wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Althought I'm new to your project, I would like to give my opipion. If it 
> doesn't make sense, please ignore it.
>
> Please, Andreas, commit your code for the gui protocol, because my code is 
> only a quick&dirty hack of the old code, your code should be much better.
>
> Also, I would like to know what do you think about the sources list, I think 
> that the code is a bit cpu and mem consuming. Maybe there is a better way of 
> do it.
I was impressed the first time I saw it, I had forgotten it completely :)
Well, in the method* DownloadDiagImp::updateSources*() I would search 
for existing sources and update them instead of cleaning the list and if 
they doesn't exists add new ones

> I agree with the Makefile stuff.
I agree too currently, Makefiles in platero are a headache

> In order to make some publicity, I think we should also announce the program 
> in apps.kde.com and freshmeat.net, because there is already a program called 
> "kmldonkey" which can generate some confusion to users.
>  
I agree

> Javier.
>
> PS: I think that we need an updated TODO file, to take care of the remaining 
> things to do and the priority of each one.
>  
I copletely agree, we should make a TODO with the remaining stuff to 
realease a first tarball. I would start the TODO with this:
- clearAll() function ( or a more apropiate name )  in each TAB to be 
called when platero gets                disconnected ( currently is only 
implemented in the settings dialog )
- Change font in console TAB
- improve ed2k io slave ( to be able to send elinks when platero isn't 
runnig )

Byeee
Carlos

> Best regards
>
>
>
> El Jueves, 20 de Marzo de 2003 01:12, Andreas Lauser escribió:
>  
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've got Internet access at last (You know I've moved a month ago). The
> > first thing I did was updating the networking code so that it supports all
> > Gui protocols up to 14 (that's 2.04beta). after a CVS update I found out
> > that this has been already done :-). Nevertheless I also made the
> > Opcode<->Primitive stuff much cleaner (no more ugly array hacks), so my
> > work was not completely for the trash can :-).
> >
> > Another question: Does anybody object to removing all dynamically created
> > files from CVS (the Makefile.* in particular). IMO they only make
> > trouble...
> >
> > CU
> >  AND
> >
> > PS: I think we could use some publicity. maybe we should prepare a beta
> > tarball (I think we are far enough for that!) and drop the mldonkey guys a
> > note to put us into their news section (like kmldonkey)
> >    
>
>