Re: [PATCH] Setter methods for names/types of a struct type

[Jose E. Marchesi]

    I won't forget to CC the list again I promise :D.
    
    > I was referring to pk_alloc and pk_assert, not to the type builders.  I
    > don't think we want to expose these two calls to the callers of libpoke.
    >
    
    Ok, I will remove them.

Thanks.
    
    >This is a matter of personal preference, but `type' is perfectly ok for
    >the main type being referred in the call.  In this case, the struc type.
    
    >When two types are passed as arguments, like in
    >pk_struct_type_set_ftype, the main subject type can still be `type' and
    >the other `field_type' or something like that.
    
    Noted, I will change them.
    
    Do you want me to send a reply to this thread with the above changes?

Yes please.

Whenever a modification is suggested/requested and you implement it, a
new version of the patch is expected (not a patch of the patch).

Thanks!