[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Probity-discuss] why not privoxy?
From: |
higuita |
Subject: |
[Probity-discuss] why not privoxy? |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:52:44 +0100 |
hi
i dont want to be rude, but why not helping implement all that
probity in privoxy instead of starting a new project
privoxy is already a very advanced filtering proxy, to clean
sex, violence, etc from web it is just a matter of adding sites
and keywords
it isnt capable of filtering ftp yet, but it is in the TODO list
it can block or just swap things with other info and the user will
never know
filtering nom web chats would be a very hard things, the only way
i remember is to just allow some server and room, but it will
never be 100% safe because it is alot more dynamic than web
so my main question is why not take a already good project and
help then to implement those thing instead of starting a new one
that take a long time to have even a simple filtering
higuita
--
One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them,
One IP to bring them all and in the zone bind them.
pgpL1buXIiIO1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Probity-discuss] why not privoxy?,
higuita <=