[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Protux-devel] Changes on version progression
From: |
Remon Sijrier |
Subject: |
Re: [Protux-devel] Changes on version progression |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Oct 2003 18:01:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.3 |
Sounds good to me, if I read around the typo's ;-P
> We will put on the website the minimum libmustux version required for each
> new protux released.
What about backwards compatibility?
Maybe an idea to give the maximum libmustux version also if there is a change
which gives backwards compatibility problems?
Ehm, me again, but is there a change mustuxAudioBus gets internal multiple
bithdepth conversions before 0.20.0?
Also the detection code isn't working properly. If you agree, I can give it a
change.
Should be nice if I can use and test protux with "hw" instead of "plughw".
(hopefully more robust alsa usage, less (no) alsa errors when setting a bus
active.....)
Greets,
Remon
- [Protux-devel] Changes on version progression, Luciano Giordana, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Protux-devel] Changes on version progression,
Remon Sijrier <=
- Re: [Protux-devel] Changes on version progression, Luciano Giordana, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Protux-devel] Changes on version progression, Remon Sijrier, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Protux-devel] Changes on version progression, Remon Sijrier, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Protux-devel] Changes on version progression, Luciano Giordana, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Protux-devel] Changes on version progression, Remon Sijrier, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Protux-devel] Changes on version progression, Luciano Giordana, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Protux-devel] Changes on version progression, Remon Sijrier, 2003/10/18
- Re: [Protux-devel] Changes on version progression, booker, 2003/10/19
- Re: [Protux-devel] Changes on version progression, Luciano Giordana, 2003/10/19
- Re: [Protux-devel] Changes on version progression, booker, 2003/10/19