[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Protux-devel] Yes, were done (almost ;-)
From: |
Remon Sijrier |
Subject: |
[Protux-devel] Yes, were done (almost ;-) |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Nov 2003 20:13:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.3 |
Yes, everything is fine now!
Ehm, about the screenshots. I just tried to make a few of them, and was
surprised by the quality of it. I used the png format, and the versions
online are with the jpg format, which are more "blurry" and even bigger
(about 2 times)?
Also they have some cosmetic bugs on it which I fixed in those very last
fixes.
Maybe I want it to be to perfect, but....
Greets,
Remon
(Sorry, I want everything to be as good as possible ;-)
On Monday 03 November 2003 19:57, Luciano Giordana wrote:
> Dont worry, when I updated Song.hh, I saw Protject and BusMonitor updating
> too. I think they got it. Anyway, check them.
>
> On Monday 03 November 2003 16:49, Remon Sijrier wrote:
> > Ok, checking it whithin a minute.
> >
> > Seems that my last fixes for the dataBox updates didn't get into your
> > local tree also. I've made those fixes on Project.cc and BusMonitor.cc
> > Also Track has an important last fix, which didn't get in!
> >
> > These are relatively important, can you maybe add these and upload it?
> > Should be really nice.
> > Thanks a lot ;-)
> >
> > Remon
> >
> > On Monday 03 November 2003 18:47, Luciano Giordana wrote:
> > > Already replaced. Please check if it is ok now
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > On Monday 03 November 2003 15:20, Luciano Giordana wrote:
> > > > Thanks Remon, it is on its way...
> > > > No need to change from 0.20.0 to 0.20.1 . Just replacement
> > > >
> > > > On Monday 03 November 2003 15:00, Remon Sijrier wrote:
> > > > > Luciano,
> > > > >
> > > > > You probably didn't update your local tree to CVS.
> > > > > Protux 0.20.0 isn't compiling due missing variables in Song.hh
> > > > >
> > > > > Please, fix it ASAP
> > > > >
> > > > > Greets,
> > > > >
> > > > > Remon
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Protux-devel mailing list
> > > > > address@hidden
> > > > > http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/protux-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Protux-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/protux-devel
- [Protux-devel] INSTRUCTIONS ON 0.20.x STABILIZATION CYCLE AND 0.20 PUBLICATION, Luciano Giordana, 2003/11/03
- [Protux-devel] Aiaiaiai, Remon Sijrier, 2003/11/03
- Re: [Protux-devel] Aiaiaiai, Luciano Giordana, 2003/11/03
- Re: [Protux-devel] Aiaiaiai, Luciano Giordana, 2003/11/03
- Re: [Protux-devel] Aiaiaiai, Remon Sijrier, 2003/11/03
- Re: [Protux-devel] Aiaiaiai, Luciano Giordana, 2003/11/03
- [Protux-devel] Yes, were done (almost ;-),
Remon Sijrier <=
- Re: [Protux-devel] Yes, were done (almost ;-), Luciano Giordana, 2003/11/03
- [Protux-devel] Regarding bugs, Remon Sijrier, 2003/11/03
- Re: [Protux-devel] Regarding bugs, Luciano Giordana, 2003/11/03
- Re: [Protux-devel] Regarding bugs, booker, 2003/11/03
- Re: [Protux-devel] Regarding bugs, Remon Sijrier, 2003/11/03
- Re: [Protux-devel] Regarding bugs, booker, 2003/11/03
- Re: [Protux-devel] Regarding bugs, Remon Sijrier, 2003/11/03
- Re: [Protux-devel] Yes, were done (almost ;-), rsff, 2003/11/04
Re: [Protux-devel] INSTRUCTIONS ON 0.20.x STABILIZATION CYCLE AND 0.20 PUBLICATION, Remon Sijrier, 2003/11/03