[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Logo prototype
From: |
Dr Eberhard W Lisse |
Subject: |
Re: Logo prototype |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 07:12:19 +0200 |
Why on earth does this have to be so complicated? You could even put the
source ocde into the logo. I am still for the simple blue PSPP(L)
thingy. People don't excpect to read the copyleft agreeement in the logo.
Simplicity...
el
In message <address@hidden>, John Darrington writes:
> > http://www.brunier.nl/pspp/pspp3.png
- Re: Logo prototype, (continued)
- Re: Logo prototype, John Darrington, 2005/01/11
- Re: Logo prototype, patrick, 2005/01/12
- Re: Logo prototype, P.C.J.G. Brunier, 2005/01/16
- Re: Logo prototype, John Darrington, 2005/01/16
- Re: Logo prototype, patrick, 2005/01/17
- Re: Logo prototype, Ben Pfaff, 2005/01/17
- Re: Logo prototype, P.C.J.G. Brunier, 2005/01/17
- Re: Logo prototype, Ben Pfaff, 2005/01/17
- Re: Logo prototype, P.C.J.G. Brunier, 2005/01/17
- Re: Logo prototype, John Darrington, 2005/01/17
- Re: Logo prototype,
Dr Eberhard W Lisse <=
- Re: Logo prototype, Ben Pfaff, 2005/01/17
- Re: Logo prototype, Ben Pfaff, 2005/01/18
- Re: Logo prototype, patrick, 2005/01/18
- Re: Logo prototype, John Darrington, 2005/01/18
- Re: Logo prototype, patrick, 2005/01/18
- Re: Logo prototype, Ben Pfaff, 2005/01/18
- Re: Logo prototype, patrick, 2005/01/18
- Message not available
- Re: Logo prototype, patrick, 2005/01/19
- Re: Logo prototype, P.C.J.G. Brunier, 2005/01/20
- Re: Logo prototype, John Darrington, 2005/01/20