[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Off topic
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: Off topic |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:27:32 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:18:29PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> You need to use `update -d' to pull new directories.
>
> Why isn't this the default behaviour? Why would anyone not wish to
> pull new directories if there were any?
The CVS manual says this:
`-d'
Create any directories that exist in the repository if they're
missing from the working directory. Normally, `update' acts only
on directories and files that were already enrolled in your
working directory.
This is useful for updating directories that were created in the
repository since the initial checkout; but it has an unfortunate
side effect. If you deliberately avoided certain directories in
the repository when you created your working directory (either
through use of a module name or by listing explicitly the files
and directories you wanted on the command line), then updating
with `-d' will create those directories, which may not be what you
want.
I'm not sure this is a good reason. Personally, I always type
`up -d', because I've been screwed by this enough times in the
past that I can't forget anymore.
--
"To the engineer, the world is a toy box full of sub-optimized and
feature-poor toys."
--Scott Adams
- Beta distribution, John Darrington, 2005/03/12
- Re: Beta distribution, Ben Pfaff, 2005/03/12
- Message not available
- Re: Beta distribution, Ben Pfaff, 2005/03/12
- Re: Beta distribution, Jason Stover, 2005/03/13
- Re: Beta distribution, Jason H. Stover, 2005/03/16
- Re: Beta distribution, John Darrington, 2005/03/16
- Re: Beta distribution, Ben Pfaff, 2005/03/19
- Re: Beta distribution, Ben Pfaff, 2005/03/16
- Off topic, John Darrington, 2005/03/21
- Re: Off topic,
Ben Pfaff <=