[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: casefile.c revision
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: casefile.c revision |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jun 2005 00:06:03 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 08:31:45PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
John, did the revised casefile comment that I posted earlier do a
good job of explaining the casefile changes we agreed on? Except
that I just now realized that we decided to do casereader cloning
instead of casemarks... Anyway, did it seem accurate other than
that?
The only other thing that confuses me is this paragraph:
Use casefile_get_reader() to create a casereader for
use in phase 2. This also transitions from phase 2 to
phase 3. Calling casefile_mode_reader() makes the same
transition, without creating a casereader.
Shouldn't the second sentence read
"This also transitions from phase 1 to phase 2."
??
J'
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- casefile.c revision, John Darrington, 2005/06/01
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: casefile.c revision, Ben Pfaff, 2005/06/02
- Re: casefile.c revision, John Darrington, 2005/06/02
- Re: casefile.c revision, Ben Pfaff, 2005/06/03
- Re: casefile.c revision, John Darrington, 2005/06/03
- Re: casefile.c revision, Ben Pfaff, 2005/06/04
- Re: casefile.c revision, John Darrington, 2005/06/04
- Re: casefile.c revision, Ben Pfaff, 2005/06/24
- Re: casefile.c revision,
John Darrington <=