Re: release candidate 5 available--stack trace for Solaris

[Ben Pfaff]

John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:

> Well we're getting somewhere.  The parameters for show_summary are clearly
> rediculous.  

In my experience sometimes gdb just gets arguments wrong.  It
seems "difficult" to get them right in the presence of compiler
optimizations.  The latest versions of gdb and gcc are supposed
to be better at this but I don't know whether they really are in
practice.

> But I don't know why you're only seeing the first few stack
> frames.

I wonder whether -g is being used consistently.
-- 
"Note that nobody reads every post in linux-kernel.   In fact, nobody who
 expects to have time left over to  actually do any real kernel work will
 read even half.  Except Alan Cox, but he's actually not human, but about
 a thousand gnomes working in under-ground caves in Swansea." --Linus