Re: non-recursive automake

[Ben Pfaff]

John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:

> That said, the non-recursive automake seems to be working fine at the
> moment (at least for me).

One thing that worries me about the non-recursive automake is
that, at least for me, it's sticking all of the object files in
the root of the build tree.  That implies that we can't have both
foo/bar.c and quux/bar.c, because their object file names would
conflict.  I don't much like that, if so.

I haven't downloaded your new tarball to see whether anything has
changed.

-- 
"A computer is a state machine.
 Threads are for people who cant [sic] program state machines."
--Alan Cox