[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: time to check in?
From: |
Jason Stover |
Subject: |
Re: time to check in? |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:43:14 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:17:43PM +0800, John Darrington wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 09:53:12AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I'm beginning to wonder whether it would be better to check in
> the set of changes we have now. It has changed from being a
> brief "reorganization" to a major code cleanup. That's not
> necessarily a bad thing, but it means that it becomes more
> difficult to coordinate. CVS isn't perfect but it does make it
> easier to coordinate changes.
>
> We don't have to get the file names perfect yet. As long as a
> ChangeLog exists to explain what's been done (I assume you'll be
> adding your own ChangeLog entries before you check in), we can
> figure out what happened over a series of renames.
>
> Also I worry about becoming less transparent to outsiders.
> Anyone who looks at the CVS tree at the moment will think nothing
> much is going on. That's certainly not true.
>
> I dunno. What do you guys think?
>
>
> Let's do the renaming, as good as we reasonably can, and then
> check-in.
>
> Oh, and can we make a decision about lib/linreg ? I'm of the opinion
> that everything except sweep.[ch] should be moved to src/math
Do you mean to make a directory called src/math/linreg with all
the linreg code in it, or just mv lib/linreg/* src/math/ ? (With
the exception of sweep.)
-Jason
--
address@hidden
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
Re: time to check in?,
Jason Stover <=