[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Renaming
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: Renaming |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:19:15 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 06:22:19PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > file-handle-def.c
> > file-handle-def.h
>
> => file-handle.[ch] I think.
>
> Won't this conflict with file-handle.q from src/language/data-io ?
Won't being in a different directory put it in a different
namespace?
> > lex-def.c identifier.c
> > lex-def.h identifier.h
>
> I would prefer token.[ch] because I would like to put more of the
> lexical knowledge here eventually.
>
> I had to make this module specifically to allow the data files to be
> read/written (they need to know which names are reserved words, so as
> to prevent variables getting created with those names). Perhaps the
> lexer needs to be split up a bit, but I think it'd be a mistake to put
> lexical knowledge into src/data. In summary, this file's purpose is
> much more specific than a tokenizer, and I think it should remain so.
OK.
> > som.c
> > som.h
>
> => manager.[ch]
>
> Isn't this a bit vague ?
"som" isn't any good. I'd like something better--suggestions
welcome.
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil."
--D. E. Knuth, "Structured Programming with go to Statements"
- Re: Renaming, Ben Pfaff, 2006/03/01
- Re: Renaming, John Darrington, 2006/03/01
- Re: Renaming,
Ben Pfaff <=
- Re: Renaming, John Darrington, 2006/03/02
- Re: Renaming, John Darrington, 2006/03/04
- Re: Renaming, Ben Pfaff, 2006/03/02
- Re: Renaming, John Darrington, 2006/03/02
- Re: Renaming, Ben Pfaff, 2006/03/02
- Yet another tarball, John Darrington, 2006/03/04
- Re: Yet another tarball, Ben Pfaff, 2006/03/03
Re: Renaming, Ben Pfaff, 2006/03/04