[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
transformations
From: |
Jason Stover |
Subject: |
transformations |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Apr 2006 10:26:30 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.10i |
I have another question about transformations. Here is
the syntax:
data list list / v0 to v2.
begin data
0.65377128 7.735648 -23.97588
-0.13087553 6.142625 -19.63854
0.34880368 7.651430 -25.26557
0.69249021 6.125125 -16.57090
-0.07368178 8.245789 -25.80001
-0.34404919 6.031540 -17.56743
0.75981559 9.832291 -28.35977
-0.46958313 5.343832 -16.79548
-0.06108490 8.838262 -29.25689
0.56154863 6.200189 -18.58219
end data
regression /variables=v0 v1 v2 /statistics defaults /dependent=v2 /method=enter
/save=residuals.
descript all/stat=all/format=serial /save.
list.
The function subcommand_save() in regression.q adds a new variable to
the dictionary, but the transformation (regression_trns_proc()) it
adds is never executed.
On the other hand, the DESCRIPTIVES procedure in the syntax above also adds a
transformation, and that transformation is executed later. I read
definition of descriptives_trns_proc() and setup_z_trns(), and I don't
understand why the DESCRIPTIVES transformation is executed but the
REGRESSION transformation is not.
So am I missing something in the subcommand_save() or in
regression_trns_proc()? Or something else entirely?
-Jason
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- transformations,
Jason Stover <=