[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a better way to represent values
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: a better way to represent values |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Dec 2008 07:23:13 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 01:00:39PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
I am still a little confused about what encoding the string data
internal to PSPP is supposed to be in. Is it supposed to be in
the default encoding for the locale that the user selected when
he/she started PSPP? Could you give an example of the "proper"
way to translate string data into that encoding?
I can quite understand that you're confused, because (for reasons of
spss compatibility) it's somewhat convoluted. Maybe I should write a
section on internationalisation to go in the developers manual.
J'
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: ADD FILES and UPDATE, Ben Pfaff, 2008/12/01
- Re: ADD FILES and UPDATE, John Darrington, 2008/12/01
- Re: ADD FILES and UPDATE, Ben Pfaff, 2008/12/02
- Re: ADD FILES and UPDATE, Ben Pfaff, 2008/12/03
- a better way to represent values (was: Re: ADD FILES and UPDATE), Ben Pfaff, 2008/12/08
- Re: a better way to represent values (was: Re: ADD FILES and UPDATE), John Darrington, 2008/12/08
- Re: a better way to represent values, Ben Pfaff, 2008/12/08
- Re: a better way to represent values,
John Darrington <=
- Re: a better way to represent values, Ben Pfaff, 2008/12/08
- Re: a better way to represent values, John Darrington, 2008/12/09
- Re: a better way to represent values (was: Re: ADD FILES and UPDATE), Jason Stover, 2008/12/08
Re: ADD FILES and UPDATE, Jason Stover, 2008/12/01