[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: status report
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: status report |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:24:10 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
> I'm not sure how this can work without at least some sort of
> enhancement to the output generation, even if this is done at a high
> level.
It will require some enhancements. That's not a big deal.
> There will need to be some kind of out-of-band data to mark the
> spots to jump to. The obvious thing to use would be a
> GtkTextMark. It would be simple to add a mark each time
> execute_syntax is called, but that wouldn't mark individual
> proceduredures.
I'm going to replace the text-only output by proper graphical
output, so GtkTextMark isn't applicable.
> Other thoughts :
>
> * If we want the marks to survive Save/Load, then we'll have to
> devise a way to encode them.
>
> * As for exporting to HTML etc, if the input is the current plain
> text, the results aren't going to be very pleasing, I think.
The graphical output will be based on the internal representation
of the tables, and the export will happen from that same internal
representation.
--
Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ men just upload their important stuff
on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;)
-- Linus Torvalds
- status report, Ben Pfaff, 2009/03/05
- Re: status report, John Darrington, 2009/03/05
- Re: status report, Ben Pfaff, 2009/03/06
- Re: status report, John Darrington, 2009/03/06
- Re: status report,
Ben Pfaff <=
- Graphical Output [Was: Re: Status], John Darrington, 2009/03/06
- Re: Graphical Output, Ben Pfaff, 2009/03/06
- Re: Graphical Output, John Darrington, 2009/03/06
- Re: Graphical Output, Ben Pfaff, 2009/03/06
- Re: Graphical Output, Ben Pfaff, 2009/03/08