[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lex function for values
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: lex function for values |
Date: |
Sat, 23 May 2009 07:17:11 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 08:03:36AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
> It struck me that the value-rep branch would lend itself to a function
> of the form:
>
> bool lex_match_value (struct lexer* , union value *);
>
>
> which would be useful for matching either a string or a number.
(A width would also need to be passed in.)
The width could be infered from the length of the string. Although
typically, the width would have to match a variable which has already
been parsed.
Is this useful very often?
Enough to make it worthwhile I think. We currently have something
like this in t-test.q (for the grouping variable). Similarly, I can
envisage that any procedure where grouping or categorical values are
involved, particularly dichotomous ones might need this.
J'
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature