[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Reliability procedure [was Re: Requesting new procs]
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Reliability procedure [was Re: Requesting new procs] |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:01:38 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
We already support /SUMMARY = TOTAL (although TOTAL is the only
supported SUMMARY argument).
It seems to work just fine for me.
J'
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:40:00AM -0400, Charles Stangor wrote:
> Here's some syntax with a bunch of statistics including the "alpha if
> item deleted" option. That option ("TOTAL") is actually represented in
> the /SUMMARY subcommand.
>
> RELIABILITY
> /VARIABLES=a b c
> /SCALE('ALL VARIABLES') ALL/MODEL=ALPHA
> /STATISTICS=DESCRIPTIVE SCALE HOTELLING CORR COV ANOVA COCHRAN TUKEY
> /SUMMARY=TOTAL MEANS VARIANCE COV CORR .
>
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: Requesting new procs, (continued)
- Re: Requesting new procs, Charles Stangor, 2010/07/16
- How to test updates, Charles Stangor, 2010/07/16
- Re: How to test updates, Ben Pfaff, 2010/07/16
- Re: How to test updates, Charles Stangor, 2010/07/16
- Re: How to test updates, Ben Pfaff, 2010/07/16
- Re: How to test updates, Michel Boaventura, 2010/07/16
- Re: How to test updates, Charles Stangor, 2010/07/16
- Re: How to test updates, Harry Thijssen, 2010/07/16
- Re: How to test updates, Ben Pfaff, 2010/07/16
- Re: Requesting new procs, Charles Stangor, 2010/07/16
- Reliability procedure [was Re: Requesting new procs],
John Darrington <=
- Re: Reliability procedure [was Re: Requesting new procs], Charles Stangor, 2010/07/16
- Re: Reliability procedure [was Re: Requesting new procs], John Darrington, 2010/07/16
- Re: Reliability procedure [was Re: Requesting new procs], Charles Stangor, 2010/07/16
- Re: Reliability procedure, Ben Pfaff, 2010/07/16
- Re: Reliability procedure, Charles Stangor, 2010/07/16