[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Endianess ?
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: Endianess ? |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Feb 2012 11:42:53 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 04:42:27PM +0100, bojo42 wrote:
> Oops, that celebration was a bit early, as the testsuite failed for
> nearly all architectures:
>
> I have a feeling that one of our problems may be Endiannes.
>
> mips: 78 179 180 181 182 183 184 308 439 440 837 922
> powerpc: 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 439 440 837 922
> s390: 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 439 440 837 922
> sparc: 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 439 440 837 922
>
> Would I be right in thinking these are all big-endian architectures?
You're right, those are all big-endian.
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
- Re: PSPP back in Debian, (continued)
- Re: PSPP back in Debian, bojo42, 2012/02/18
- Re: PSPP back in Debian, Ben Pfaff, 2012/02/18
- Re: PSPP back in Debian, Ben Pfaff, 2012/02/18
- Re: PSPP back in Debian, bojo42, 2012/02/20
- Re: PSPP back in Debian, John Darrington, 2012/02/20
- Re: PSPP back in Debian, bojo42, 2012/02/20
- Re: PSPP back in Debian, bojo42, 2012/02/26
- Re: PSPP back in Debian, Ben Pfaff, 2012/02/27
- Re: PSPP back in Debian, bojo42, 2012/02/28
- Endianess ?, John Darrington, 2012/02/19
- Re: Endianess ?,
Ben Pfaff <=
- Re: Endianess ?, John Darrington, 2012/02/19
- Re: Endianess ?, Luis Cebamanos, 2012/02/20
- Re: Endianess ?, John Darrington, 2012/02/20