[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multiplication Sign vs. Bullet Operator
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: Multiplication Sign vs. Bullet Operator |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:11:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Thanks Friedrich,
There may be cultural influences at play here.
I think in English speaking countries the x is more common - at least in
printed material -
and it is used to what I am seeing, although I do write it with a dot when
writing by hand.
The dot, has a problem, that in English speaking lands it can be confused with
the decimal
separator - that of course is not a problem in continental Europe where the
comma is used as
the decimal separator.
What we could do, is to mark this string as translatable. That way, the
translators can use
x . or whatever they think appropriate.
J'
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:21:44AM +0200, Friedrich Beckmann wrote:
I changed this with commit
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/pspp.git/commit/?h=gtk3&id=dc93fae2746573f1e71d93fbc297b48dc0c32b90
to the use of the multiplication sign. This is then according to:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Scientific_and_engineering_notation
and looks like this:
Thanks for the hint! I always wrote it with dot, but obviously the
recommended way is
the multiplication sign ?x?.
Friedrich
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature