[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Update
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: Update |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Dec 2015 07:11:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
All of Alan's substantial changes have been pushed.
That is to say, we now have the /PRINT=CLUSTERS command, which I think Andy was
wanting. There has also been a big improvement to the way the algorithm works,
resulting in better separated clusters. And some extra subcommands such as
/CRITERIA=NOINITIAL
We don't yet have a /SAVE option. In principle, this should be easy. It will
be no different from the /SAVE option in linear REGRESSION but as this seems to
be the subject of bug #44877, I'm reluctant to add that until we have understood
this bug.
J'
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 04:32:17PM -0600, Alan Mead wrote:
Actually, I think John's recent modification is the best because it
seems to solve a problem the older implementation had with sometimes
assigning the clusters in lope-sided ways.
John, is that true (i.e., your recent modification includes my changes,
right?)? And do you need anything else? I have supplied some test data
that I think one of you turned into a test case? And a modification to
the instructions. I can re-send any of the bits that were mine. The
best way to do this is to upload patches to the bug tracker?
-Alan
On 12/9/2015 3:56 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> It's not in. I think that we are awaiting an update from Alan. If
> not, then I apologize for holding up the process, and I'd appreciate
> it if Alan could point me to an updated version.
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Andy King <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi Alan/John,
>>
>> Hope both of you are well. I am just wondering if there is any progress
>> with this PSPP clustering functionality please?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>> Subject: Re: Update
>>> To: address@hidden
>>> CC: address@hidden; address@hidden
>>> From: address@hidden
>>> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 15:47:41 -0500
>>> Ok, I might need some help with the test.
>>>
>>> -Alan
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/22/2015 3:12 PM, John Darrington wrote:
>>>> Hi Alan,
>>>>
>>>> My recollection was that we were just waiting for a couple of things,
>>>> viz:
>>>> an update to the documentation, and a test for the new subcommand.
>>>>
>>>> Once we have this, we can check it in.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 02:40:56PM -0500, Alan Mead wrote:
>>>> Ben or John,
>>>>
>>>> Has my patch for the CLUSTER /SAVE option gone into the main release?
>>>> If not, do we know when it will?
>>>>
>>>> At one point, we were waiting for me to fix a bug (the cluster
>>>> memberships reported for each case needed a translation to match the
>>>> clusters listed in the main/cluster membership portion of the report).
>>>> That has been resolved and I emailed a patch. I can submit another
>>>> patch if necessary.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> -Alan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/22/2015 2:09 PM, Andy King wrote:
>>>>> Hi Alan,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for this update, it is greatly appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> I understand the complexities of adding this to PSPP. Please do keep
>>>>> me updated as and when things progress.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you think the /PRINT option will be available in the next release
>>>>> (if it isn't already)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks very much,
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Subject: Re: Update
>>>>> To: address@hidden
>>>>> From: address@hidden
>>>>> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:36:50 -0500
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy,
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, I must have missed your email. The short answer is that I
>>>>> think this feature will become available, but not right away. I'm
>>>>> fluent in some other programming languages, but not C so coding for
>>>>> PSPP is difficult. Also, the actual operations involved with the
>>>>> /SAVE option depend on using internal software features of PSPP
>>>>> ("readers"). the /PRINT option was a bit simpler.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope this update helps. I appreciate your interest and I wish I
>>>>> could be more confident in a more urgent solution.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Alan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/21/2015 12:32 PM, Andy King wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Alan
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think I've received a response to my below email - any
>>>>> form of update would be really very helpful and I'd be grateful.
>>>>>
>>>>> Many thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> From: address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>>>>> To: address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>>>>> Subject: RE: address@hidden
>>>>> <mailto:address@hidden> has sent you a file via WeTransfer
>>>>> Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:22:12 +0100
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Alan,
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope all is well.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am by no means pushing here as I know this is all voluntary but
>>>>> just wondering if any progress has been made (or news discovered)
>>>>> on the clustering function looking to be in-built to PSPP?
>>>>> Specifically the /SAVE command we discussed.
>>>>>
>>>>> You may recall we were writing a book....we have now submitted the
>>>>> final copy of the text for the book chapter we have co-authored.
>>>>> However, as some of this is online content, I will be able to
>>>>> factor in this for PSPP if we have any idea when the /SAVE command
>>>>> will be available? At present it uses SPSS (it would be great to
>>>>> show off PSPP).
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>>
>>>>> A
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Subject: Re: FW: address@hidden
>>>>> <mailto:address@hidden> has sent you a file via WeTransfer
>>>>> To: address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>;
>>>>> address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>>>>> From: address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>>>>> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 20:50:22 -0500
>>>>>
>>>>> Harry,
>>>>>
>>>>> What's new in this version?
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy: AFAIK, no additional work on clustering has been done
>>>>> (unless John's done it).
>>>>>
>>>>> -Alan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/31/2015 8:04 PM, Andy King wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Alan
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this patch for saving the cluster membership or is it to
>>>>> correct the csv file handling we can across the other day?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:44:35 +0000
>>>>> To: address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>>>>> From: address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>>>>> Subject: address@hidden
>>>>> <mailto:address@hidden> has sent you a file via WeTransfer
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>>>>> sent you some files
>>>>> ?Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> In this version there is a little memory leak, but it contains
>>>>> alan's patch and you can read csv files with it.?
>>>>>
>>>>>
<https://www.wetransfer.com/downloads/daff587c3c2e83198a3cbe713806904c20150831154144/407aa72efc388b1ebf4b31503928dc9920150831154144/c572a6>
>>>>> Download
>>>>>
>>>>>
<https://www.wetransfer.com/downloads/daff587c3c2e83198a3cbe713806904c20150831154144/407aa72efc388b1ebf4b31503928dc9920150831154144/c572a6>
>>>>>
>>>>>
<https://www.wetransfer.com/downloads/daff587c3c2e83198a3cbe713806904c20150831154144/407aa72efc388b1ebf4b31503928dc9920150831154144/c572a6>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Files (45.6 MB total)
>>>>> pspp-085+20150827-snapshot-32bits-setup.exe
>>>>> pspp-085+20150827-snapshot-64bits-setup.exe
>>>>> Will be deleted on
>>>>> 7 September, 2015
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Get more out of WeTransfer, get Plus
>>>>> <https://www.wetransfer.com/plus?trk=email-recipient_download>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> About WeTransfer <https://www.wetransfer.com/about> Contact
>>>>> <https://www.wetransfer.com/contact> Legal
>>>>> <https://www.wetransfer.com/legal> _Powered by Amazon Web
>>>>> Services_
>>>>> <http://ox-d.wetransfer.com/w/1.0/ai?auid=443977&cs=23423>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Alan D. Mead, Ph.D.
>>>>> President, Talent Algorithms Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>> science + technology = better workers
>>>>>
>>>>> +815.588.3846 (Office)
>>>>> +267.334.4143 (Mobile)
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.alanmead.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Announcing the Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing (JCAT), a
>>>>> peer-reviewed electronic journal designed to advance the science and
>>>>> practice of computerized adaptive testing: http://www.iacat.org/jcat
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Alan D. Mead, Ph.D.
>>>>> President, Talent Algorithms Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>> science + technology = better workers
>>>>>
>>>>> +815.588.3846 (Office)
>>>>> +267.334.4143 (Mobile)
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.alanmead.org
>>>>>
>>>>> Announcing the Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing (JCAT), a
>>>>> peer-reviewed electronic journal designed to advance the science and
>>>>> practice of computerized adaptive testing: http://www.iacat.org/jcat
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Alan D. Mead, Ph.D.
>>>> President, Talent Algorithms Inc.
>>>>
>>>> science + technology = better workers
>>>>
>>>> +815.588.3846 (Office)
>>>> +267.334.4143 (Mobile)
>>>>
>>>> http://www.alanmead.org
>>>>
>>>> Announcing the Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing (JCAT), a
>>>> peer-reviewed electronic journal designed to advance the science and
>>>> practice of computerized adaptive testing: http://www.iacat.org/jcat
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Alan D. Mead, Ph.D.
>>> President, Talent Algorithms Inc.
>>>
>>> science + technology = better workers
>>>
>>> +815.588.3846 (Office)
>>> +267.334.4143 (Mobile)
>>>
>>> http://www.alanmead.org
>>>
>>> Announcing the Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing (JCAT), a
>>> peer-reviewed electronic journal designed to advance the science and
>>> practice of computerized adaptive testing: http://www.iacat.org/jcat
>>>
--
Alan D. Mead, Ph.D.
President, Talent Algorithms Inc.
science + technology = better workers
+815.588.3846 (Office)
+267.334.4143 (Mobile)
http://www.alanmead.org
Announcing the Journal of Computerized Adaptive Testing (JCAT), a
peer-reviewed electronic journal designed to advance the science and
practice of computerized adaptive testing: http://www.iacat.org/jcat
--
Avoid eavesdropping. Send strong encryted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: Update,
John Darrington <=