[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: p value for spearman's correlation
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: p value for spearman's correlation |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Dec 2020 10:00:00 -0800 |
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 3:23 AM John Darrington
<john@darrington.wattle.id.au> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 07:58:40PM -0600, Alan Mead wrote:
> Alternatively, I wouldn't be upset if PSPP refuses to print any p-value
> for N < 30. I think ideally we would add a keyword requesting a more
> advanced algorithm.
>
> I think this is probably the best course of action at least in the short
> term.
If not printing a p-value for this case is likely to confuse others, perhaps the
procedure should add a footnote indicating why the p-value is not output.
- p value for spearman's correlation, Ramagokula Krishnan, 2020/12/26
- Re: p value for spearman's correlation, John Darrington, 2020/12/26
- Re: p value for spearman's correlation, Alan Mead, 2020/12/26
- Re: p value for spearman's correlation, Ben Pfaff, 2020/12/26
- Re: p value for spearman's correlation, Alan Mead, 2020/12/26
- Re: p value for spearman's correlation, John Darrington, 2020/12/26
- Re: p value for spearman's correlation, Alan Mead, 2020/12/26
- Re: p value for spearman's correlation, Alex Ernesto Davila Davila, 2020/12/26
- Re: p value for spearman's correlation, Alan Mead, 2020/12/27
- Re: p value for spearman's correlation, John Darrington, 2020/12/27
- Re: p value for spearman's correlation,
Ben Pfaff <=
- Re: p value for spearman's correlation, Alan Mead, 2020/12/27
- Re: p value for spearman's correlation, Alex Ernesto Davila Davila, 2020/12/27