|
From: | Alan Mead |
Subject: | Re: reference |
Date: | Sat, 27 May 2017 23:37:48 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 |
According to this blog posting:
http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2015/01/how-to-cite-software-in-apa-style.html The reference would be something like: GNU PSPP version 0.10.2-g654fff [Computer Software.] (2017). Retrieved from http://pspp.awardspace.com. Assuming you were using version 0.10.2-g654fff (which you can check in Help > About) and that you retrieved the software from awardspace.com this year. In the text you would cite this like "... used GNU PSPP (2017)..." or "All analyses were conducted using PSPP (GNU PSPP, 2017)." It's not perfectly clear to me whether you should call the software "GNU PSPP" or just "PSPP". The manual is titled "PSPP" but at the bottom of the first node (after the TOC), it says "This manual is for GNU PSPP..." I think the developers would prefer that "GNU" be included. -Alan On 5/27/2017 9:36 PM, E Hrle wrote:
-- Alan D. Mead, Ph.D. President, Talent Algorithms Inc. science + technology = better workers http://www.alanmead.org I've... seen things you people wouldn't believe... functions on fire in a copy of Orion. I watched C-Sharp glitter in the dark near a programmable gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like Ruby... on... Rails... Time for Pi. --"The Register" user Alister, applying the famous "Blade Runner" speech to software development |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |