[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pthreads-hackers] pthreads and cancellation
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Pthreads-hackers] pthreads and cancellation |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Jan 2002 12:46:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.25i |
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 08:57:51PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> We've atomicity.h, but I'm not sure whether you could use the current
> interface. You can always modify it or add some new operations.
> The architectures which don't have the atomic operations will still
> use spinlocks.
Wonderful. I will have a closer look at that. I eralized that I only need
an atomic bit in the worst case, and that should be easy to get. If there
are other atomic operations, that will help.
> See the following threads:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/1999-08/msg00139.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2000-01/msg00000.html
Ah, very good! Thanks for pointing that out to me.
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org address@hidden
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org address@hidden
address@hidden
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de