[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v9 10/14] hw/arm/smmuv3: Abort on vfio or vhost ca
From: |
Auger Eric |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v9 10/14] hw/arm/smmuv3: Abort on vfio or vhost case |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Mar 2018 18:53:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 |
Hi Peter,
On 08/03/18 20:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 February 2018 at 18:46, Eric Auger <address@hidden> wrote:
>> At the moment, the SMMUv3 does not support notification on
>> TLB invalidation. So let's abort as soon as such notifier gets
>> enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> hw/arm/smmuv3.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
>> index 384393f..5efe933 100644
>> --- a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
>> +++ b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
>> @@ -1074,12 +1074,23 @@ static void smmuv3_class_init(ObjectClass *klass,
>> void *data)
>> dc->realize = smmu_realize;
>> }
>>
>> +static void smmuv3_notify_flag_changed(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu,
>> + IOMMUNotifierFlag old,
>> + IOMMUNotifierFlag new)
>> +{
>> + if (old == IOMMU_NOTIFIER_NONE) {
>> + error_setg(&error_fatal,
>> + "SMMUV3: vhost and vfio notifiers not yet supported");
>> + }
>> +}
>
> Is this triggerable by the guest, or by the user on the command
> line, or only by a bug in the board or other QEMU code?
by the user on the command line.
Thanks
Eric
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>