qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v4 0/8] Support disabling TCG on ARM


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v4 0/8] Support disabling TCG on ARM
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 22:22:02 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0

Hi Peter, Paolo, Alex, Thomas :)

On 7/2/19 4:08 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 at 20:49, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> wrote:
[...]
>> $ git backport-diff -u v3 -r target-arm.next..v4
>> Key:
>> [----] : patches are identical
>> [####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream patch
>> [down] : patch is downstream-only
>> The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, 
>> respectively
>>
[skipping patches already applied...]

>> 004/8:[----] [--] 'RFC target/arm: Restrict pre-ARMv7 cpus to TCG'
>> 005/8:[----] [--] 'RFC target/arm: Do not build pre-ARMv7 cpus when using 
>> KVM'
>> 006/8:[----] [--] 'RFC target/arm: Restrict R and M profiles to TCG'
>> 007/8:[----] [--] 'RFC target/arm: Do not build A/M-profile cpus when using 
>> KVM'
>> 008/8:[----] [--] 'target/arm: Do not build TCG objects when TCG is off'
> 
> I'm going to apply patches 1 and 2 to target-arm.next for rc0 (since
> 2 is helpful to redhat downstream and taking 1 now reduces the
> amount of code-movement patches you'll need to rebase). Patch 3
> doesn't compile and 4-8 are rfc.

The remaining patches can be applied without conflict, so no need to
respin (yet) IMO.

Paolo/Thomas, do you mind reviewing patches 5 and 7? They are kconfig
related.

Peter/Alex, do you mind reviewing patches 4 and 6 first, then 5 and 7 (5
and 7 can wait for Paolo/Thomas' review first).

Thanks!

Phil.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]