[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 25/28] target/arm: Implement M-profile "minimal RAS implem
From: |
Richard Henderson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 25/28] target/arm: Implement M-profile "minimal RAS implementation" |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:04:29 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 |
On 11/19/20 3:56 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> For v8.1M the architecture mandates that CPUs must provide at
> least the "minimal RAS implementation" from the Reliability,
> Availability and Serviceability extension. This consists of:
> * an ESB instruction which is a NOP
> -- since it is in the HINT space we need only add a comment
> * an RFSR register which will RAZ/WI
> * a RAZ/WI AIRCR.IESB bit
> -- the code which handles writes to AIRCR does not allow setting
> of RES0 bits, so we already treat this as RAZ/WI; add a comment
> noting that this is deliberate
> * minimal implementation of the RAS register block at 0xe0005000
> -- this will be in a subsequent commit
> * setting the ID_PFR0.RAS field to 0b0010
> -- we will do this when we add the Cortex-M55 CPU model
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> target/arm/cpu.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> target/arm/t32.decode | 4 ++++
> hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
r~
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH v2 25/28] target/arm: Implement M-profile "minimal RAS implementation",
Richard Henderson <=