[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 03/18] target/arm: use arm_is_el2_enabled() where applicable
From: |
Rémi Denis-Courmont |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 03/18] target/arm: use arm_is_el2_enabled() where applicable |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Jan 2021 14:08:31 +0200 |
Le maanantaina 21. joulukuuta 2020, 22.54.08 EET Richard Henderson a écrit :
> On 12/18/20 2:37 AM, remi.denis.courmont@huawei.com wrote:
> > From: Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis.courmont@huawei.com>
> >
> > Do not assume that EL2 is available in non-secure context.
>
> Just noticed this wording is off. Should be
> "Do not assume that EL2 is unavailable in a secure context"
It would be clearer, but I'd hate to rereresend the patchset just for this.
Indeed, the second sentence clarifies that this was meant reciprocally, i.e.
that it should not be assumed that EL2 is always and only available in non-
secure context:
> > That equivalence is broken by ARMv8.4-SEL2.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis.courmont@huawei.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >
> > target/arm/cpu.h | 4 ++--
> > target/arm/helper-a64.c | 8 +-------
> > target/arm/helper.c | 33 +++++++++++++--------------------
> > 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
--
Rémi Denis-Courmont
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH 03/18] target/arm: use arm_is_el2_enabled() where applicable,
Rémi Denis-Courmont <=