[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] hw/intc: set GICD_TYPER.DVIS for GICv4
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] hw/intc: set GICD_TYPER.DVIS for GICv4 |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:34:02 +0000 |
On Sun, 24 Jan 2021 at 02:53, Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com> wrote:
>
> The VLPI frames are what make the redistributor size change, so ensure
> we state in GICD_TYPER that we have them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
> ---
> hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c
> index b65f56f903..833deb0a74 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c
> @@ -387,6 +387,9 @@ static MemTxResult gicd_readl(GICv3State *s, hwaddr
> offset,
>
> *data = (1 << 25) | (1 << 24) | (sec_extn << 10) |
> (0xf << 19) | itlinesnumber;
> + if (s->revision == 4) {
> + *data |= (1 << 18);;
> + }
Double semicolon.
> return MEMTX_OK;
> }
> case GICD_IIDR:
I think I'd prefer not to take this patch in mainline for the moment:
it would be "safe", in the sense that it doesn't affect anything,
but it's not the only thing in this register that changes for GIC
versions > 3, and it would make a lot more sense to go in as part
of the general support for the feature the bit is advertising.
thanks
-- PMM
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] hw/intc: set GICD_TYPER.DVIS for GICv4,
Peter Maydell <=