[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH v11 0/2] arm/virt: CXL support via pxb_cxl
From: |
Jonathan Cameron |
Subject: |
[PATCH v11 0/2] arm/virt: CXL support via pxb_cxl |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jun 2022 15:19:48 +0100 |
Previously patches 40 and 41 of
[PATCH v10 00/45] CXl 2.0 emulation Support
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20220429144110.25167-45-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com/#r
Now the base CXL support including for x86/pc is upstream (patches 1-39)
there are no dependencies between the next few CXL elements in my queue
so they can be reviewed / merged in parallel. Hence I'll be sending switch
support (43-45) separately and hopefully DOE / CDAT support in a few days.
I'm assuming this particular series should go through the arm tree if
the maintainers are happy?
Changes since v10:
- CXL machine setup is now entirely from the supporting machines rather
than via code in machine.c and vl.c. Change made for x86 in:
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20220608145440.26106-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com/
- Dropped Ben's sign off from patch 1 which resulted from him carrying
these patches of mine for a while. It isn't a useful bit of history
to carry now they are back to me.
This short series adds support for CXL host bridges and CXL fixed memory
windows on arm/virt. Two types of memory region are needed:
1. Register space for CXL host bridges (static allowance for 16)
2. CXL fixed memory windows: Ranges of host PA space which
are statically mapped to an interleave across 1 or more CXL host
bridges.
Both of these types of region are described via appropriate ACPI tables.
As the CEDT table is created with the same code as for x86 I don't think
there is much value in duplicating the existing CXL bios-tables test.
The second patch adds a single complex test. We test a lot more configurations
on x86 but it does not seem useful to duplicate them all on ARM and this single
test should act as a smoke test for any problems that occur.
Run through CI at:
https://gitlab.com/jic23/qemu/-/pipelines/564934276
Intermittent (unrelated I assume) failure in msys64 aio-test resolved
with a retry.
Thanks,
Jonathan
Jonathan Cameron (2):
hw/arm/virt: Basic CXL enablement on pci_expander_bridge instances
pxb-cxl
qtest/cxl: Add aarch64 virt test for CXL
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
hw/arm/virt.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/hw/arm/virt.h | 3 +++
tests/qtest/cxl-test.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
tests/qtest/meson.build | 1 +
5 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
2.32.0
- [PATCH v11 0/2] arm/virt: CXL support via pxb_cxl,
Jonathan Cameron <=
- [PATCH v11 1/2] hw/arm/virt: Basic CXL enablement on pci_expander_bridge instances pxb-cxl, Jonathan Cameron, 2022/06/16
- Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] hw/arm/virt: Basic CXL enablement on pci_expander_bridge instances pxb-cxl, Peter Maydell, 2022/06/24
- Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] hw/arm/virt: Basic CXL enablement on pci_expander_bridge instances pxb-cxl, Jonathan Cameron, 2022/06/24
- Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] hw/arm/virt: Basic CXL enablement on pci_expander_bridge instances pxb-cxl, Peter Maydell, 2022/06/24
- Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] hw/arm/virt: Basic CXL enablement on pci_expander_bridge instances pxb-cxl, Jonathan Cameron, 2022/06/24
- Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] hw/arm/virt: Basic CXL enablement on pci_expander_bridge instances pxb-cxl, Jonathan Cameron, 2022/06/24
- Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] hw/arm/virt: Basic CXL enablement on pci_expander_bridge instances pxb-cxl, Peter Maydell, 2022/06/24
- Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] hw/arm/virt: Basic CXL enablement on pci_expander_bridge instances pxb-cxl, Jonathan Cameron, 2022/06/24
[PATCH v11 2/2] qtest/cxl: Add aarch64 virt test for CXL, Jonathan Cameron, 2022/06/16