qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 9/9] hw/arm/aspeed: firework: add I2C MUXes for VR channels


From: Jae Hyun Yoo
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] hw/arm/aspeed: firework: add I2C MUXes for VR channels
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 06:58:41 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0

Hello Joel,

On 6/22/2022 10:27 PM, Joel Stanley wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 17:29, Jae Hyun Yoo <quic_jaehyoo@quicinc.com> wrote:

Add 2-level cascaded I2C MUXes for SOC VR channels into the Firework
machine.

Signed-off-by: Jae Hyun Yoo <quic_jaehyoo@quicinc.com>
---
  hw/arm/aspeed.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed.c b/hw/arm/aspeed.c
index 526f3b651a9f..866a60cf7b4e 100644
--- a/hw/arm/aspeed.c
+++ b/hw/arm/aspeed.c
@@ -1038,7 +1038,7 @@ static void qcom_firework_fru_init(I2CBus *bus, uint8_t 
addr, uint32_t rsize)
  static void qcom_dc_scm_firework_i2c_init(AspeedMachineState *bmc)
  {
      AspeedSoCState *soc = &bmc->soc;
-    I2CSlave *mux;
+    I2CSlave *therm_mux, *cpuvr_mux;

      /* Create the generic DC-SCM hardware */
      qcom_dc_scm_bmc_i2c_init(bmc);
@@ -1048,16 +1048,24 @@ static void 
qcom_dc_scm_firework_i2c_init(AspeedMachineState *bmc)
      /* I2C4 */
      qcom_firework_fru_init(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(&soc->i2c, 4), 0x50, 128 * 
1024);

-    /* I2C - 8 Thermal Diodes*/
-    mux = i2c_slave_create_simple(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(&soc->i2c, 8), "pca9548",
-                                  0x70);
-    i2c_slave_create_simple(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(mux, 0), TYPE_LM75, 0x4C);
-    i2c_slave_create_simple(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(mux, 1), TYPE_LM75, 0x4C);
-    i2c_slave_create_simple(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(mux, 2), TYPE_TMP75, 0x48);
-    i2c_slave_create_simple(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(mux, 3), TYPE_TMP75, 0x48);
-    i2c_slave_create_simple(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(mux, 4), TYPE_TMP75, 0x48);
-

You only just added this. If you modify the previous patch to call the
"mux" variable "therm_mux" then you don't need to modify it in this
patch.

or just squash them both together. I don't think there's much value in
having two separate patches.

Okay. I'll fix the 8/9 patch to call the variable "therm_mux" instead.

Thanks,
Jae

-    /* I2C-9 Fan Controller (MAX31785) */
+    /* I2C7 CPUVR MUX */
+    cpuvr_mux = i2c_slave_create_simple(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(&soc->i2c, 7),
+                                        "pca9546", 0x70);
+    i2c_slave_create_simple(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(cpuvr_mux, 0), "pca9548", 
0x72);
+    i2c_slave_create_simple(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(cpuvr_mux, 1), "pca9548", 
0x72);
+    i2c_slave_create_simple(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(cpuvr_mux, 2), "pca9548", 
0x72);
+    i2c_slave_create_simple(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(cpuvr_mux, 3), "pca9548", 
0x72);
+
+    /* I2C8 Thermal Diodes*/
+    therm_mux = i2c_slave_create_simple(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(&soc->i2c, 8),
+                                        "pca9548", 0x70);
+    i2c_slave_create_simple(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(therm_mux, 0), TYPE_LM75, 
0x4C);
+    i2c_slave_create_simple(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(therm_mux, 1), TYPE_LM75, 
0x4C);
+    i2c_slave_create_simple(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(therm_mux, 2), TYPE_LM75, 
0x48);
+    i2c_slave_create_simple(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(therm_mux, 3), TYPE_LM75, 
0x48);
+    i2c_slave_create_simple(pca954x_i2c_get_bus(therm_mux, 4), TYPE_LM75, 
0x48);
+
+    /* I2C9 Fan Controller (MAX31785) */
      i2c_slave_create_simple(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(&soc->i2c, 9), "max31785", 
0x52);
      i2c_slave_create_simple(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(&soc->i2c, 9), "max31785", 
0x54);
  }
--
2.25.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]