qemu-arm
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 12/14] aspeed: Make aspeed_board_init_flashes public


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] aspeed: Make aspeed_board_init_flashes public
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:54:11 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0

On 6/29/22 16:14, Alex Bennée wrote:

Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> writes:

On 6/24/22 18:50, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 6/23/22 20:43, Peter Delevoryas wrote:


On Jun 23, 2022, at 8:09 AM, Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org> wrote:

On 6/23/22 12:26, Peter Delevoryas wrote:
Signed-off-by: Peter Delevoryas <pdel@fb.com>

Let's start simple without flash support. We should be able to
load FW blobs in each CPU address space using loader devices.

Actually, I was unable to do this, perhaps because the fb OpenBMC
boot sequence is a little weird. I specifically _needed_ to have
a flash device which maps the firmware in at 0x2000_0000, because
the fb OpenBMC U-Boot SPL jumps to that address to start executing
from flash? I think this is also why fb OpenBMC machines can be so slow.

$ ./build/qemu-system-arm -machine fby35 \
      -device loader,file=fby35.mtd,addr=0,cpu-num=0 -nographic \
      -d int -drive file=fby35.mtd,format=raw,if=mtd
Ideally we should be booting from the flash device directly using
the machine option '-M ast2600-evb,execute-in-place=true' like HW
does. Instructions are fetched using SPI transfers. But the amount
of code generated is tremendous.

Yeah because there is a potential race when reading from HW so we throw
away TB's after executing them because we have no way of knowing if it
has changed under our feet. See 873d64ac30 (accel/tcg: re-factor non-RAM
execution code) which cleaned up this handling.

See some profiling below for a
run which barely reaches DRAM training in U-Boot.

Some more profiling on both ast2500 and ast2600 machines shows :


* ast2600-evb,execute-in-place=true :

Type               Object  Call site                Wait Time (s)         Count 
 Average (us)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BQL mutex  0x564dc03922e0  accel/tcg/cputlb.c:1365       14.21443
32909927          0.43

This is unavoidable as a HW access needs the BQL held so we will go
through this cycle every executed instruction.

Did I miss why the flash contents are not mapped into the physical
address space? Isn't that how it appear to the processor?


There are two modes :
if (ASPEED_MACHINE(machine)->mmio_exec) {
            memory_region_init_alias(boot_rom, NULL, "aspeed.boot_rom",
                                     &fl->mmio, 0, size);
            memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), FIRMWARE_ADDR,
                                        boot_rom);
        } else {
            memory_region_init_rom(boot_rom, NULL, "aspeed.boot_rom",
                                   size, &error_abort);
            memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), FIRMWARE_ADDR,
                                        boot_rom);
            write_boot_rom(drive0, FIRMWARE_ADDR, size, &error_abort);
        }

The default boot mode uses the ROM. No issue.

The "execute-in-place=true" option creates an alias on the region of
the flash contents and each instruction is then fetched from the flash
drive with SPI transactions.

With old FW images, using an older U-boot, the machine boots in a couple
of seconds. See the profiling below for a witherspoon-bmc machine using
U-Boot 2016.07.

  qemu-system-arm -M witherspoon-bmc,execute-in-place=true  -drive 
file=./flash-witherspoon-bmc,format=raw,if=mtd -drive 
file=./flash-witherspoon-bmc2,format=raw,if=mtd -nographic -nodefaults 
-snapshot -serial mon:stdio -enable-sync-profile
  ...
  U-Boot 2016.07-00040-g8425e96e2e27-dirty (Jun 24 2022 - 23:21:57 +0200)
Watchdog enabled
  DRAM:  496 MiB
  Flash: 32 MiB
  In:    serial
  Out:   serial
  Err:   serial
  Net:
  (qemu) info sync-profile
  Type               Object  Call site                Wait Time (s)         
Count  Average (us)
  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BQL mutex  0x56189610b2e0  accel/tcg/cputlb.c:1365        0.25311      
12346237          0.02
  condvar    0x5618970cf220  softmmu/cpus.c:423             0.05506             
2      27530.78
  BQL mutex  0x56189610b2e0  util/rcu.c:269                 0.04709             
2      23544.26
  condvar    0x561896d0fc78  util/thread-pool.c:90          0.01340            
83        161.47
  condvar    0x56189610b240  softmmu/cpus.c:571             0.00005             
1         54.93
  condvar    0x56189610b280  softmmu/cpus.c:642             0.00003             
1         32.88
  BQL mutex  0x56189610b2e0  util/main-loop.c:318           0.00003            
34          0.76
  mutex      0x561896eade00  tcg/region.c:204               0.00002           
995          0.02
  rec_mutex  [           2]  util/async.c:682               0.00002           
493          0.03
  mutex      [           2]  chardev/char.c:118             0.00001           
404          0.03
  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


However, with recent U-boots, it takes quite a while to reach DRAM training.
Close to a minute. See the profiling below for an ast2500-evb machine using
U-Boot 2019.04.

 qemu-system-arm -M ast2500-evb,execute-in-place=true  -net 
nic,macaddr=C0:FF:EE:00:00:03,netdev=net0  -drive 
file=./flash-ast2500-evb,format=raw,if=mtd  -nographic -nodefaults -snapshot 
-serial mon:stdio  -enable-sync-profile
  qemu-system-arm: warning: Aspeed iBT has no chardev backend
  qemu-system-arm: warning: nic ftgmac100.1 has no peer
  QEMU 7.0.50 monitor - type 'help' for more information
U-Boot 2019.04-00080-g6ca27db3f97b-dirty (Jun 24 2022 - 23:22:03 +0200) SOC : AST2500-A1
  RST : Power On
  LPC Mode : SIO:Enable : SuperIO-2e
  Eth : MAC0: RGMII, , MAC1: RGMII,
  Model: AST2500 EVB
  DRAM:  448 MiB (capacity:512 MiB, VGA:64 MiB, ECC:off)
  MMC:   sdhci_slot0@100: 0, sdhci_slot1@200: 1
  Loading Environment from SPI Flash... SF: Detected mx25l25635e with page size 
256 Bytes, erase size 64 KiB, total 32 MiB
  *** Warning - bad CRC, using default environment
In: serial@1e784000
  Out:   serial@1e784000
  Err:   serial@1e784000
  Net:   eth0: ethernet@1e660000
  Warning: ethernet@1e680000 (eth1) using random MAC address - 4a:e5:9a:4a:c7:c5
  , eth1: ethernet@1e680000
  Hit any key to stop autoboot:  2
  (qemu) info sync-profile
  Type               Object  Call site                Wait Time (s)         
Count  Average (us)
  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  condvar    0x561f10c9ef88  util/thread-pool.c:90         10.01196            
28     357570.00
  BQL mutex  0x561f102362e0  accel/tcg/cputlb.c:1365        0.29496      
14248621          0.02
  condvar    0x561f110325a0  softmmu/cpus.c:423             0.02231             
2      11152.57
  BQL mutex  0x561f102362e0  util/rcu.c:269                 0.01447             
4       3618.60
  condvar    0x561f10236240  softmmu/cpus.c:571             0.00010             
1        102.19
  mutex      0x561f10e9f1c0  tcg/region.c:204               0.00007          
3052          0.02
  mutex      [           2]  chardev/char.c:118             0.00003          
1486          0.02
  condvar    0x561f10236280  softmmu/cpus.c:642             0.00003             
1         29.38
  BQL mutex  0x561f102362e0  accel/tcg/cputlb.c:1426        0.00002           
973          0.02
  BQL mutex  0x561f102362e0  util/main-loop.c:318           0.00001            
34          0.41
  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Something in the layout of the FW is making a big difference. One
that could be relevant is that the recent versions are using a device
tree.

There might be no good solution to this issue but I fail to analyze
it correctly. Is there a way to collect information on the usage of
Translation Blocks ?

Thanks,

C.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]