Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Decouple INTx-to-LNKx routing from south bridges

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 10:21:49AM +0000, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 9. Dezember 2022 15:23:59 UTC schrieb "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" 
> <philmd@linaro.org>:
> >On 20/11/22 16:05, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
> >> v1:
> >> ===
> >> 
> >> During my PIIX consolidation work [1] I've noticed that both PIIX models 
> >> have
> >> quite different pci_slot_get_pirq() implementations. These functions seem 
> >> to
> >> map PCI INTx pins to input pins of a programmable interrupt router which is
> >> AFAIU board-specific. IOW, board-specific assumptions are baked into the 
> >> device
> >> models which prevent e.g. the whole PIIX4 south bridge to be reusable in 
> >> the PC
> >> machine.
> >> 
> >> This series first factors out pci_bus_map_irqs() from pci_bus_irqs() which
> >> then allowes for moving the two board-specific PIIX pci_slot_get_pirq()
> >> funtions into their respective boards. With these changes, the PIIX4 south
> >> bridge could eventually become an alternative to the PIIX3-Frankenstein
> >> solution in the PC machine.
> >
> >Series:
> >Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> 
> Ping
> 
> Who will pull this?

I'll merge this, thanks!