[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/2] hw/arm/stm32f405: correctly describe the memory layout
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/2] hw/arm/stm32f405: correctly describe the memory layout |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Dec 2022 10:53:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.1 |
Hi Felipe,
On 18/12/22 08:12, Felipe Balbi wrote:
STM32F405 has 128K of SRAM and another 64K of CCM (Core-coupled
Memory) at a different base address. Correctly describe the memory
layout to give existing FW images have a chance to run unmodified.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
---
hw/arm/stm32f405_soc.c | 8 ++++++++
include/hw/arm/stm32f405_soc.h | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/arm/stm32f405_soc.c b/hw/arm/stm32f405_soc.c
index c07947d9f8b1..cef23d7ee41a 100644
--- a/hw/arm/stm32f405_soc.c
+++ b/hw/arm/stm32f405_soc.c
@@ -139,6 +139,14 @@ static void stm32f405_soc_realize(DeviceState *dev_soc,
Error **errp)
}
memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory, SRAM_BASE_ADDRESS, &s->sram);
+ memory_region_init_ram(&s->ccm, NULL, "STM32F405.ccm", CCM_SIZE,
Including the machine name in the memory description seems a bad
habit from old days. What do you think about renaming as
'core-coupled-memory'?
+ &err);
+ if (err != NULL) {
+ error_propagate(errp, err);
+ return;
+ }
+ memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory, CCM_BASE_ADDRESS, &s->ccm);
+
armv7m = DEVICE(&s->armv7m);
qdev_prop_set_uint32(armv7m, "num-irq", 96);
qdev_prop_set_string(armv7m, "cpu-type", s->cpu_type);
diff --git a/include/hw/arm/stm32f405_soc.h b/include/hw/arm/stm32f405_soc.h
index 5bb0c8d56979..249ab5434ec7 100644
--- a/include/hw/arm/stm32f405_soc.h
+++ b/include/hw/arm/stm32f405_soc.h
@@ -46,7 +46,9 @@ OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(STM32F405State, STM32F405_SOC)
#define FLASH_BASE_ADDRESS 0x08000000
#define FLASH_SIZE (1024 * 1024)
#define SRAM_BASE_ADDRESS 0x20000000
-#define SRAM_SIZE (192 * 1024)
+#define SRAM_SIZE (128 * 1024)
+#define CCM_BASE_ADDRESS 0x10000000
+#define CCM_SIZE (64 * 1024)
Since the CCM_SIZE won't be used elsewhere, we can simply use '64 * KiB'
in the memory_region_init_ram() in the source file. Up to the maintainer
:)
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>