[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/3] virtio-iommu: Add an option to define the input range wi
From: |
Alex Williamson |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 1/3] virtio-iommu: Add an option to define the input range width |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 2024 06:37:00 -0700 |
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 14:14:19 +0100
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 1/24/24 00:51, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 19:15:55 +0100
> > Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> aw-bits is a new option that allows to set the bit width of
> >> the input address range. This value will be used as a default for
> >> the device config input_range.end. By default it is set to 64 bits
> >> which is the current value.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> include/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.h | 1 +
> >> hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c | 4 +++-
> >> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.h
> >> b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.h
> >> index 781ebaea8f..5fbe4677c2 100644
> >> --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.h
> >> +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.h
> >> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ struct VirtIOIOMMU {
> >> bool boot_bypass;
> >> Notifier machine_done;
> >> bool granule_frozen;
> >> + uint8_t aw_bits;
> >> };
> >>
> >> #endif
> >> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c
> >> index ec2ba11d1d..e7f299e0c6 100644
> >> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c
> >> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.c
> >> @@ -1314,7 +1314,8 @@ static void virtio_iommu_device_realize(DeviceState
> >> *dev, Error **errp)
> >> */
> >> s->config.bypass = s->boot_bypass;
> >> s->config.page_size_mask = qemu_real_host_page_mask();
> >> - s->config.input_range.end = UINT64_MAX;
> >> + s->config.input_range.end =
> >> + s->aw_bits == 64 ? UINT64_MAX : BIT_ULL(s->aw_bits) - 1;
> > What happens when someone sets aw_bits = 1? There are a whole bunch of
> > impractical values here ripe for annoying bug reports. vtd_realize()
> > returns an Error for any values other than 39 or 48. We might pick an
> > arbitrary lower bound (39?) or some other more creative solution here
> > to avoid those silly issues in our future. Thanks,
> You're right. I can check the input value. This needs to be dependent on
> the machine though but this should be feasable.
> Then I would allow 39 and 48 for q35 and 64 only on ARM.
AFAIK AMD-Vi supports 64-bit address space. Without querying the host
there's no way to place an accurate limit below 64-bit. Thanks,
Alex
> >> s->config.domain_range.end = UINT32_MAX;
> >> s->config.probe_size = VIOMMU_PROBE_SIZE;
> >>
> >> @@ -1525,6 +1526,7 @@ static Property virtio_iommu_properties[] = {
> >> DEFINE_PROP_LINK("primary-bus", VirtIOIOMMU, primary_bus,
> >> TYPE_PCI_BUS, PCIBus *),
> >> DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("boot-bypass", VirtIOIOMMU, boot_bypass, true),
> >> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("aw-bits", VirtIOIOMMU, aw_bits, 64),
> >> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> >> };
> >>
>
[PATCH 2/3] virtio-iommu: Trace domain range limits as unsigned int, Eric Auger, 2024/01/23
[PATCH 3/3] hw/pc: Set the default virtio-iommu aw-bits to 39 on pc_q35_9.0 onwards, Eric Auger, 2024/01/23
Re: [PATCH 0/3] VIRTIO-IOMMU: Introduce an aw-bits option, Jean-Philippe Brucker, 2024/01/29