[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH for-2.9 v3 0/5] Sheepdog cleanups
From: |
Jeff Cody |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH for-2.9 v3 0/5] Sheepdog cleanups |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Jan 2017 11:47:52 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:42:53PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 04/01/2017 05:07, Jeff Cody wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 03:07:07PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 29/11/2016 12:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>> Cleaning up the code and removing duplication makes it simpler to
> >>> later adapt it for the multiqueue work.
> >>>
> >>> Tested against sheepdog 1.0. I also tested taking snapshots and reverting
> >>> to older snapshots, but the latter only worked with "dog vdi rollback".
> >>> Neither loadvm nor qemu-img worked for me.
> >>>
> >>> Paolo
> >>>
> >>> v1->v2: placate patchew
> >>> v2->v3: rebase
> >>>
> >>> Paolo Bonzini (5):
> >>> sheepdog: remove unused cancellation support
> >>> sheepdog: reorganize coroutine flow
> >>> sheepdog: do not use BlockAIOCB
> >>> sheepdog: simplify inflight_aio_head management
> >>> sheepdog: reorganize check for overlapping requests
> >>>
> >>> block/sheepdog.c | 289
> >>> ++++++++++++++++---------------------------------------
> >>> 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+), 206 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>
> >> 2.8 is now out, so ping.
> >>
> >
> > I don't have a functional sheepdog setup at the moment; have you tested
> > these patches, or should I set up a test rig for them? (I am guessing I
> > should do the latter; either way, I'll pull the patches in once I or someone
> > else has tested them).
>
> Yes, I have tested them. Fedora's sheepdog package is fubar right now.
> I've built an updated one and asked for ownership but haven't had any
> answer yet.
>
> Paolo
Great, thanks.
Applied to my block branch:
git://github.com/codyprime/qemu-kvm-jtc.git block
-Jeff