qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v6 0/2] allow blockdev-add for NFS


From: Peter Lieven
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v6 0/2] allow blockdev-add for NFS
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 16:34:41 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1

Am 19.01.2017 um 16:20 schrieb Kevin Wolf:
Am 19.01.2017 um 15:59 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
On 01/19/2017 08:30 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
qemu-img: Could not open
'nfs://172.21.200.61/vcore-dev-cdrom/templates/VC_debian8-20170116.qcow2,linux?readahead=131072':
Block protocol 'nfs' doesn't support the option 'readahead-size'

Please let me know if the below fix would be correct:
No, this needs to be fixed the other way round: runtime_opts must use
the names as specified in the schema, and nfs_client_open() must access
them as such. Without that, blockdev-add can't work (and the command
line only with the "wrong" old option names from the URL, whereas it
should be using the same names as the QAPI schema).
Shouldn't we support both for backwards compatiblity.?
blockdev-add only needs to support the modern naming.  But yes,
preserving back-compat spelling of the command-line spellings, as well
as matching blockdev-add spellings, is desirable.
We only just added the individual command line options, previously it
only supported the URL.

It's true that we have the messed up version of the options in 2.8, so
strictly speaking we would break compatibility with a release, but it's
only one release, it's only the nfs driver, and the documentation of the
options is the schema, which had the right option names even in 2.8
(they just didn't work).

So I wouldn't feel bad about removing the wrong names in this specific
case.

So want exactly do you want to do? Fix the names in the QAPI schema
to use the old naming?

Peter




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]