qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 02/21] backup: init copy_bitmap from sync_bitmap


From: Fam Zheng
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 02/21] backup: init copy_bitmap from sync_bitmap for incremental
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:09:39 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)

On Fri, 12/23 17:28, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> We should not copy non-dirty clusters in write notifiers. So,
> initialize copy_bitmap from sync_bitmap.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden>
> ---
>  block/backup.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/backup.c b/block/backup.c
> index 6b27e55..621b1c0 100644
> --- a/block/backup.c
> +++ b/block/backup.c
> @@ -437,6 +437,34 @@ out:
>      return ret;
>  }
>  
> +/* init copy_bitmap from sync_bitmap */
> +static void backup_incremental_init_copy_bitmap(BackupBlockJob *job)
> +{
> +    int64_t sector;
> +    BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *dbi;
> +    uint32_t sect_gran =
> +        bdrv_dirty_bitmap_granularity(job->sync_bitmap) >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> +    int64_t sz = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_size(job->sync_bitmap);
> +    int64_t sectors_per_cluster = cluster_size_sectors(job);
> +    uint32_t cl_gran = MAX(1, sect_gran / sectors_per_cluster);
> +
> +    dbi = bdrv_dirty_iter_new(job->sync_bitmap, 0);
> +    while ((sector = bdrv_dirty_iter_next(dbi)) != -1) {
> +        int64_t cluster = sector / sectors_per_cluster;
> +        int64_t next_sector = (cluster + cl_gran) * sectors_per_cluster;
> +
> +        hbitmap_set(job->copy_bitmap, cluster, cl_gran);
> +
> +        if (next_sector >= sz) {
> +            break;
> +        }
> +
> +        bdrv_set_dirty_iter(dbi, (cluster + cl_gran) * sectors_per_cluster);
> +    }
> +
> +    bdrv_dirty_iter_free(dbi);
> +}
> +
>  static void coroutine_fn backup_run(void *opaque)
>  {
>      BackupBlockJob *job = opaque;
> @@ -453,20 +481,22 @@ static void coroutine_fn backup_run(void *opaque)
>      end = DIV_ROUND_UP(job->common.len, job->cluster_size);
>  
>      job->copy_bitmap = hbitmap_alloc(end, 0);
> -    hbitmap_set(job->copy_bitmap, 0, end);
>  
>      job->before_write.notify = backup_before_write_notify;
>      bdrv_add_before_write_notifier(bs, &job->before_write);
>  
>      if (job->sync_mode == MIRROR_SYNC_MODE_NONE) {
> +        hbitmap_set(job->copy_bitmap, 0, end);

This is confusing. It seems job->copy_bitmap is actually a superset of clusters
to copy instead of the exact one?  Because "none" mode doesn't need blanket copy
- only overwritten clusters are copied...

>          while (!block_job_is_cancelled(&job->common)) {
>              /* Yield until the job is cancelled.  We just let our 
> before_write
>               * notify callback service CoW requests. */
>              block_job_yield(&job->common);
>          }
>      } else if (job->sync_mode == MIRROR_SYNC_MODE_INCREMENTAL) {
> +        backup_incremental_init_copy_bitmap(job);

... But here you are only marking bits in sync_bitmap.

Fam

>          ret = backup_run_incremental(job);
>      } else {
> +        hbitmap_set(job->copy_bitmap, 0, end);
>          /* Both FULL and TOP SYNC_MODE's require copying.. */
>          for (; start < end; start++) {
>              bool error_is_read;
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]