[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 02/21] backup: init copy_bitmap from sync_bitmap
From: |
Fam Zheng |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 02/21] backup: init copy_bitmap from sync_bitmap for incremental |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:09:39 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) |
On Fri, 12/23 17:28, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> We should not copy non-dirty clusters in write notifiers. So,
> initialize copy_bitmap from sync_bitmap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden>
> ---
> block/backup.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/backup.c b/block/backup.c
> index 6b27e55..621b1c0 100644
> --- a/block/backup.c
> +++ b/block/backup.c
> @@ -437,6 +437,34 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/* init copy_bitmap from sync_bitmap */
> +static void backup_incremental_init_copy_bitmap(BackupBlockJob *job)
> +{
> + int64_t sector;
> + BdrvDirtyBitmapIter *dbi;
> + uint32_t sect_gran =
> + bdrv_dirty_bitmap_granularity(job->sync_bitmap) >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> + int64_t sz = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_size(job->sync_bitmap);
> + int64_t sectors_per_cluster = cluster_size_sectors(job);
> + uint32_t cl_gran = MAX(1, sect_gran / sectors_per_cluster);
> +
> + dbi = bdrv_dirty_iter_new(job->sync_bitmap, 0);
> + while ((sector = bdrv_dirty_iter_next(dbi)) != -1) {
> + int64_t cluster = sector / sectors_per_cluster;
> + int64_t next_sector = (cluster + cl_gran) * sectors_per_cluster;
> +
> + hbitmap_set(job->copy_bitmap, cluster, cl_gran);
> +
> + if (next_sector >= sz) {
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + bdrv_set_dirty_iter(dbi, (cluster + cl_gran) * sectors_per_cluster);
> + }
> +
> + bdrv_dirty_iter_free(dbi);
> +}
> +
> static void coroutine_fn backup_run(void *opaque)
> {
> BackupBlockJob *job = opaque;
> @@ -453,20 +481,22 @@ static void coroutine_fn backup_run(void *opaque)
> end = DIV_ROUND_UP(job->common.len, job->cluster_size);
>
> job->copy_bitmap = hbitmap_alloc(end, 0);
> - hbitmap_set(job->copy_bitmap, 0, end);
>
> job->before_write.notify = backup_before_write_notify;
> bdrv_add_before_write_notifier(bs, &job->before_write);
>
> if (job->sync_mode == MIRROR_SYNC_MODE_NONE) {
> + hbitmap_set(job->copy_bitmap, 0, end);
This is confusing. It seems job->copy_bitmap is actually a superset of clusters
to copy instead of the exact one? Because "none" mode doesn't need blanket copy
- only overwritten clusters are copied...
> while (!block_job_is_cancelled(&job->common)) {
> /* Yield until the job is cancelled. We just let our
> before_write
> * notify callback service CoW requests. */
> block_job_yield(&job->common);
> }
> } else if (job->sync_mode == MIRROR_SYNC_MODE_INCREMENTAL) {
> + backup_incremental_init_copy_bitmap(job);
... But here you are only marking bits in sync_bitmap.
Fam
> ret = backup_run_incremental(job);
> } else {
> + hbitmap_set(job->copy_bitmap, 0, end);
> /* Both FULL and TOP SYNC_MODE's require copying.. */
> for (; start < end; start++) {
> bool error_is_read;
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
- Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 02/21] backup: init copy_bitmap from sync_bitmap for incremental,
Fam Zheng <=