[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH RFC 0/1] vmstate: fix the failed iotests case 68
From: |
Fam Zheng |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH RFC 0/1] vmstate: fix the failed iotests case 68 and 91 |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:37:38 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) |
On Tue, 03/07 03:53, QingFeng Hao wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am not sure if the fix is correct because I am not very clear about the
> logic in vmstate.c. From my test, once size=0, the iotests case 68 failed
> due to the assert. So just send this draft patch for your comments!
> The patch is based on commit 17783ac828a "Merge remote-tracking branch
> 'remotes/dgibson/tags/ppc-for-2.9-20170303' into staging".
I cannot reproduce the failure on either 17783ac828a or current head
56b51708e9e. Both passes for me. I wonder where do you get the size=0.
Fam
- Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests case 68 and 91, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests case 68 and 91, Kevin Wolf, 2017/03/07
- Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests case 68 and 91, Halil Pasic, 2017/03/07
- Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests case 68 and 91, QingFeng Hao, 2017/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests case 68 and 91, Halil Pasic, 2017/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests case 68 and 91, QingFeng Hao, 2017/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests case 68 and 91, Halil Pasic, 2017/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 1/1] vmstate: draft fix for failed iotests case 68 and 91, QingFeng Hao, 2017/03/09
Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH RFC 0/1] vmstate: fix the failed iotests case 68 and 91,
Fam Zheng <=