qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v20 13/30] block: new bdrv_reopen_bitmaps_rw int


From: Max Reitz
Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH v20 13/30] block: new bdrv_reopen_bitmaps_rw interface
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2017 15:27:23 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0

On 2017-06-02 13:21, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Add format driver handler, which should mark loaded read-only
> bitmaps as 'IN_USE' in the image and unset read_only field in
> corresponding BdrvDirtyBitmap's.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <address@hidden>
> ---
>  block.c                   | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  include/block/block_int.h |  7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
> index 04af7697dc..161db9e32a 100644
> --- a/block.c
> +++ b/block.c
> @@ -2946,12 +2946,16 @@ void bdrv_reopen_commit(BDRVReopenState *reopen_state)
>  {
>      BlockDriver *drv;
>      BlockDriverState *bs;
> +    bool old_can_write, new_can_write;
>  
>      assert(reopen_state != NULL);
>      bs = reopen_state->bs;
>      drv = bs->drv;
>      assert(drv != NULL);
>  
> +    old_can_write =
> +        !bdrv_is_read_only(bs) && !(bdrv_get_flags(bs) & BDRV_O_INACTIVE);
> +
>      /* If there are any driver level actions to take */
>      if (drv->bdrv_reopen_commit) {
>          drv->bdrv_reopen_commit(reopen_state);
> @@ -2965,6 +2969,19 @@ void bdrv_reopen_commit(BDRVReopenState *reopen_state)
>      bs->read_only = !(reopen_state->flags & BDRV_O_RDWR);
>  
>      bdrv_refresh_limits(bs, NULL);
> +
> +    new_can_write =
> +        !bdrv_is_read_only(bs) && !(bdrv_get_flags(bs) & BDRV_O_INACTIVE);
> +    if (!old_can_write && new_can_write && drv->bdrv_reopen_bitmaps_rw) {
> +        Error *local_err = NULL;
> +        if (drv->bdrv_reopen_bitmaps_rw(bs, &local_err) < 0) {
> +            /* This is not fatal, bitmaps just left read-only, so all 
> following
> +             * writes will fail. User can remove read-only bitmaps to unblock
> +             * writes.
> +             */

In a sense, it pretty much is fatal. We were asked to make the image
non-read-only but we failed because it effectively still is read-only.

But I can't think of anything better, and you're right, removing the
bitmaps would resolve the situation. This would require the user to know
that updating the bitmaps was the issue, and local_err may not actually
reflect that.

> +            error_report_err(local_err);

So I'd prepend this with something like "$node_name: Failed to make
dirty bitmaps writable", and maybe append a hint like "Removing all
persistent dirty bitmaps from this node will allow writing to it".

Max

> +        }
> +    }
>  }
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/include/block/block_int.h b/include/block/block_int.h
> index 8d3724cce6..1dc6f2e90d 100644
> --- a/include/block/block_int.h
> +++ b/include/block/block_int.h
> @@ -380,6 +380,13 @@ struct BlockDriver {
>                               uint64_t parent_perm, uint64_t parent_shared,
>                               uint64_t *nperm, uint64_t *nshared);
>  
> +    /**
> +     * Bitmaps should be marked as 'IN_USE' in the image on reopening image
> +     * as rw. This handler should realize it. It also should unset readonly
> +     * field of BlockDirtyBitmap's in case of success.
> +     */
> +    int (*bdrv_reopen_bitmaps_rw)(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp);
> +
>      QLIST_ENTRY(BlockDriver) list;
>  };
>  
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]