[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] German BSI analysed security of KVM / QEMU
From: |
Kevin Wolf |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-block] [Qemu-devel] German BSI analysed security of KVM / QEMU |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Oct 2017 17:24:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) |
Am 16.10.2017 um 15:38 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> > Another thing that made me a bit sad is that they mention qed as a
> > better performing alternative for qcow2. Even in 2017, people keep
> > spreading this nonsense. :-(
>
> Probably because when you google for QED you inevitably hit this article
> near the top:
>
> https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTY0MQ
>
> And there's little clear information on QEMU website to show that QED
> is essentially an obsolete experiment.
>
> Perhaps some clear update to this page would help, and also in the
> qemu docs
>
> https://wiki.qemu.org/Features/QED
I updated the wiki page, maybe this will help a bit.
We could also consider printing a warning when you create a new image in
an obsolete native qemu format (i.e. qcow1 and qed).
Kevin