Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 0/9] nbd block status base:allocation

[Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy]

09.03.2018 22:08, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/15/2018 07:51 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > Here is minimal realization of base:allocation context of NBD
> > block-status extension, which allows to get block status through
> > NBD.
> >
> > Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (9):
> >    nbd/server: add nbd_opt_invalid helper
> >    nbd: change indenting in nbd.h
> >    nbd: BLOCK_STATUS for standard get_block_status function: server part
> >    block/nbd-client: save first fatal error in nbd_iter_error
> >    nbd/client: fix error messages in nbd_handle_reply_err
> >    nbd: BLOCK_STATUS for standard get_block_status function: client part
> >    iotests.py: tiny refactor: move system imports up
> >    iotests: add file_path helper
> >    iotests: new test 206 for NBD BLOCK_STATUS
>
> I'd really like to send a PULL request for NBD on Monday, in order to 
> make the 2.12 softfreeze deadline (this is a new feature, so if we 
> miss Tuesday, we have to wait until 2.13 or whatever the next release 
> is called).  Where do you stand on rebasing this, and what help can I 
> offer? (I know you have factored out some of the patches in another 
> thread that I'm in the middle of reviewing as well; you can submit the 
> later patches even before the earlier ones land, and use a 'Based-on:' 
> tag in the cover letter to make it obvious the dependencies between 
> series).

I'm now at start of "Re: [PATCH 6/9] nbd: BLOCK_STATUS for standard 
get_block_status function: client part", and I think rebasing on 
byte-based is too much for me for that moment (10:20 pm =). I'll do my 
best on Monday morning as early as I can.

--
Best regards,
Vladimir