[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v6 07/42] nvme: refactor nvme_addr_read
From: |
Maxim Levitsky |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v6 07/42] nvme: refactor nvme_addr_read |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:38:28 +0200 |
On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 07:28 -0700, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> From: Klaus Jensen <address@hidden>
>
> Pull the controller memory buffer check to its own function. The check
> will be used on its own in later patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <address@hidden>
> Acked-by: Keith Busch <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/block/nvme.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c
> index b38d7e548a60..08a83d449de3 100644
> --- a/hw/block/nvme.c
> +++ b/hw/block/nvme.c
> @@ -52,14 +52,22 @@
>
> static void nvme_process_sq(void *opaque);
>
> +static inline bool nvme_addr_is_cmb(NvmeCtrl *n, hwaddr addr)
> +{
> + hwaddr low = n->ctrl_mem.addr;
> + hwaddr hi = n->ctrl_mem.addr + int128_get64(n->ctrl_mem.size);
> +
> + return addr >= low && addr < hi;
> +}
> +
> static void nvme_addr_read(NvmeCtrl *n, hwaddr addr, void *buf, int size)
> {
> - if (n->cmbsz && addr >= n->ctrl_mem.addr &&
> - addr < (n->ctrl_mem.addr + int128_get64(n->ctrl_mem.size))) {
> + if (n->cmbsz && nvme_addr_is_cmb(n, addr)) {
> memcpy(buf, (void *)&n->cmbuf[addr - n->ctrl_mem.addr], size);
> - } else {
> - pci_dma_read(&n->parent_obj, addr, buf, size);
> + return;
> }
> +
> + pci_dma_read(&n->parent_obj, addr, buf, size);
> }
>
> static int nvme_check_sqid(NvmeCtrl *n, uint16_t sqid)
Note that this patch still contains a bug that it removes the check against the
accessed
size, which you fix in later patch.
I prefer to not add a bug in first place
However if you have a reason for this, I won't mind.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
[PATCH v6 10/42] nvme: refactor device realization, Klaus Jensen, 2020/03/16
[PATCH v6 01/42] nvme: rename trace events to nvme_dev, Klaus Jensen, 2020/03/16