qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL 14/53] block: apply COR-filter to block-stream jobs


From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Subject: Re: [PULL 14/53] block: apply COR-filter to block-stream jobs
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 08:26:52 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1

28.01.2021 21:38, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Andrey,

On 1/26/21 3:19 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
From: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>

This patch completes the series with the COR-filter applied to
block-stream operations.

Adding the filter makes it possible in future implement discarding
copied regions in backing files during the block-stream job, to reduce
the disk overuse (we need control on permissions).

Also, the filter now is smart enough to do copy-on-read with specified
base, so we have benefit on guest reads even when doing block-stream of
the part of the backing chain.

Several iotests are slightly modified due to filter insertion.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20201216061703.70908-14-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
---
  block/stream.c             | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
  tests/qemu-iotests/030     |   8 +--
  tests/qemu-iotests/141.out |   2 +-
  tests/qemu-iotests/245     |  20 ++++---
  4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/stream.c b/block/stream.c
...
@@ -228,7 +211,9 @@ void stream_start(const char *job_id, BlockDriverState *bs,
      bool bs_read_only;
      int basic_flags = BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ | BLK_PERM_WRITE_UNCHANGED;
      BlockDriverState *base_overlay;
+    BlockDriverState *cor_filter_bs = NULL;
      BlockDriverState *above_base;
+    QDict *opts;
assert(!(base && bottom));
      assert(!(backing_file_str && bottom));
@@ -266,30 +251,62 @@ void stream_start(const char *job_id, BlockDriverState 
*bs,
          }
      }
- if (bdrv_freeze_backing_chain(bs, above_base, errp) < 0) {
-        return;
-    }
-
      /* Make sure that the image is opened in read-write mode */
      bs_read_only = bdrv_is_read_only(bs);
      if (bs_read_only) {
-        if (bdrv_reopen_set_read_only(bs, false, errp) != 0) {
-            bs_read_only = false;
-            goto fail;
+        int ret;
+        /* Hold the chain during reopen */
+        if (bdrv_freeze_backing_chain(bs, above_base, errp) < 0) {
+            return;
+        }
+
+        ret = bdrv_reopen_set_read_only(bs, false, errp);
+
+        /* failure, or cor-filter will hold the chain */
+        bdrv_unfreeze_backing_chain(bs, above_base);
+
+        if (ret < 0) {
+            return;
          }
      }
- /* Prevent concurrent jobs trying to modify the graph structure here, we
-     * already have our own plans. Also don't allow resize as the image size is
-     * queried only at the job start and then cached. */
-    s = block_job_create(job_id, &stream_job_driver, NULL, bs,
-                         basic_flags | BLK_PERM_GRAPH_MOD,
+    opts = qdict_new();

Coverity reported (CID 1445793) that this resource could be leaked...

+
+    qdict_put_str(opts, "driver", "copy-on-read");
+    qdict_put_str(opts, "file", bdrv_get_node_name(bs));
+    /* Pass the base_overlay node name as 'bottom' to COR driver */
+    qdict_put_str(opts, "bottom", base_overlay->node_name);
+    if (filter_node_name) {
+        qdict_put_str(opts, "node-name", filter_node_name);
+    }
+
+    cor_filter_bs = bdrv_insert_node(bs, opts, BDRV_O_RDWR, errp);
+    if (!cor_filter_bs) {

... probably here.

Should we call g_free(opts) here?


Actually, not..

bdrv_insert_node() calls bdrv_open() which eats options even on failure.

I see, CID already marked false-positive?


+        goto fail;
+    }
+
+    if (!filter_node_name) {
+        cor_filter_bs->implicit = true;
+    }
+
+    s = block_job_create(job_id, &stream_job_driver, NULL, cor_filter_bs,
+                         BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ,
                           basic_flags | BLK_PERM_WRITE,
                           speed, creation_flags, NULL, NULL, errp);
      if (!s) {
          goto fail;
      }
+ /*
+     * Prevent concurrent jobs trying to modify the graph structure here, we
+     * already have our own plans. Also don't allow resize as the image size is
+     * queried only at the job start and then cached.
+     */
+    if (block_job_add_bdrv(&s->common, "active node", bs, 0,
+                           basic_flags | BLK_PERM_WRITE, &error_abort)) {
+        goto fail;
+    }
+
      /* Block all intermediate nodes between bs and base, because they will
       * disappear from the chain after this operation. The streaming job reads
       * every block only once, assuming that it doesn't change, so forbid 
writes
@@ -310,9 +327,9 @@ void stream_start(const char *job_id, BlockDriverState *bs,
      s->base_overlay = base_overlay;
      s->above_base = above_base;
      s->backing_file_str = g_strdup(backing_file_str);
+    s->cor_filter_bs = cor_filter_bs;
      s->target_bs = bs;
      s->bs_read_only = bs_read_only;
-    s->chain_frozen = true;
s->on_error = on_error;
      trace_stream_start(bs, base, s);
@@ -320,8 +337,10 @@ void stream_start(const char *job_id, BlockDriverState *bs,
      return;
fail:
+    if (cor_filter_bs) {
+        bdrv_cor_filter_drop(cor_filter_bs);
+    }
      if (bs_read_only) {
          bdrv_reopen_set_read_only(bs, true, NULL);
      }
-    bdrv_unfreeze_backing_chain(bs, above_base);
  }
...




--
Best regards,
Vladimir



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]