Re: [PATCH 3/3] iotests: distinguish 'skipped' and 'not run' states

[Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy]

On 06.09.23 17:09, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> Each particular testcase could skipped intentionally and accidentally.
> For example the test is not designed for a particular image format or
> is not run due to the missed library.
>
> The latter case is unwanted in reality. Though the discussion has
> revealed that failing the test in such a case would be bad. Thus the
> patch tries to do different thing. It adds additional status for
> the test case - 'skipped' and bound intentinal cases to that state.

Hmm. Do I miss something, or in this patch you only split them, not making "not run" 
produce an error? So ./check still reports success when some tests are "not run"?

The split itself looks correct to me.

--
Best regards,
Vladimir