[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] virtio: split into vhost-user-base and vhost-user-dev
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] virtio: split into vhost-user-base and vhost-user-device |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Nov 2023 12:52:03 -0500 |
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 05:40:10PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 10:56:05AM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >> Lets keep a cleaner split between the base class and the derived
> >> vhost-user-device which we can use for generic vhost-user stubs. This
> >> includes an update to introduce the vq_size property so the number of
> >> entries in a virtq can be defined.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> >> Message-Id: <20231009095937.195728-2-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> >
> > I applied but I think for this release we are better off just
> > preventing users from instanciating these on command line -
> > developers can always hack code to drop this.
>
> I guess if a user doesn't read the documentation and makes up some
> random numbers for the properties they deserve what they get?
Problem is users tend to create weird workflows a la https://xkcd.com/1172/
> > Can you post a patch please?
>
> Is:
>
> /* comment out if you want to use backends qemu doesn't know about */
> .abstract = true,
>
> really worth it?
>
For now I'd say so, yes.
> --
> Alex Bennée
> Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro