qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] pflash: fix sectors vs bytes confusion in blk_pread_nonzeroe


From: Michael Tokarev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pflash: fix sectors vs bytes confusion in blk_pread_nonzeroes()
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 14:37:16 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

30.01.2024 03:27, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
The following expression is incorrect because blk_pread_nonzeroes()
deals in units of bytes, not sectors:

   bytes = MIN(size - offset, BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS)
                                               ^^^^^^^

BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_BYTES is the appropriate constant.

Fixes: a4b15a8b9ef2 ("pflash: Only read non-zero parts of backend image")
Cc: Xiang Zheng <zhengxiang9@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
  hw/block/block.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/block/block.c b/hw/block/block.c
index 9f52ee6e72..ff503002aa 100644
--- a/hw/block/block.c
+++ b/hw/block/block.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static int blk_pread_nonzeroes(BlockBackend *blk, hwaddr 
size, void *buf)
      BlockDriverState *bs = blk_bs(blk);
for (;;) {
-        bytes = MIN(size - offset, BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS);
+        bytes = MIN(size - offset, BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_BYTES);

Hmm.  This smells like a -stable material, but you know better not
to Cc: qemu-stable@ for unrelated stuff...  Is it not for stable?

Thanks,

/mjt



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]