Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Initial support for SPDM Responders

[Alistair Francis]

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 6:52 PM Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk> wrote:
>
> On Feb 15 14:44, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 12:44:00 +1000
> > Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Just wanted to add that back in v2 Klaus Jensen stated:
> >
> > "I have no problem with picking this up for nvme, but I'd rather not take
> >  the full series through my tree without reviews/acks from the pci
> >  maintainers."
> >
> > So I'd like to add my request that Michael and/or Marcell takes a look
> > when they have time.
> >
> > I've been carrying more or less the first 2 patches in my CXL staging
> > tree for a couple of years (the initial Linux Kernel support that Lukas
> > Wunner is now handling was developed against this) and I would love
> > to see this upstream. Along with PCI and CXL and NVME usecases this
> > is a major part of the Confidential Compute device assignment story
> > via PCI/TDISP and CXL equivalent.
> >
> > It's not changed in significant ways since v2 back in October last year.
> >
>
> Would someone be willing to sign up to maintain the spdm_socket backend?

I'm happy to and should have already edited MAINTAINERS to indicate
that. I'll fix that up in the next version

Alistair