qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 09/13] osdep: move O_DSYNC and O_DIRECT defines from file-


From: Stefano Garzarella
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/13] osdep: move O_DSYNC and O_DIRECT defines from file-posix
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 17:21:29 +0200

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 04:14:48PM GMT, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 04:55:18PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
These defines are also useful for vhost-user-blk when it is compiled
in some POSIX systems that do not define them, so let's move them to
“qemu/osdep.h”.

Suggested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
 include/qemu/osdep.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
 block/file-posix.c   | 14 --------------
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/qemu/osdep.h b/include/qemu/osdep.h
index f61edcfdc2..e165b5cb1b 100644
--- a/include/qemu/osdep.h
+++ b/include/qemu/osdep.h
@@ -325,6 +325,20 @@ void QEMU_ERROR("code path is reachable")
 #define ESHUTDOWN 4099
 #endif

+/* OS X does not have O_DSYNC */
+#ifndef O_DSYNC
+#ifdef O_SYNC
+#define O_DSYNC O_SYNC
+#elif defined(O_FSYNC)
+#define O_DSYNC O_FSYNC
+#endif
+#endif
+
+/* Approximate O_DIRECT with O_DSYNC if O_DIRECT isn't available */
+#ifndef O_DIRECT
+#define O_DIRECT O_DSYNC
+#endif

Please don't do this - we can't be confident that all code in
QEMU will be OK with O_DIRECT being simulated in this way.

I'm not convinced that the O_DSYNC simulation is a good idea
to do tree-wide either.

I was a little scared, and you and the failing tests on win64 convinced me to bring this back as in v4 ;-)

Thanks,
Stefano




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]