qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 14/20] qapi: fix non-compliant JSON examples


From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/20] qapi: fix non-compliant JSON examples
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:48:31 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> writes:

> On Fri, Jun 14, 2024, 6:55 AM Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > If we parse all examples as QMP, we need them to conform to a standard
>> > so that they render correctly. Once the QMP lexer is active for
>> > examples, these will produce warning messages and fail the build.
>> >
>> > The QMP lexer still supports elisions, but they must be represented as
>> > the value "...", so two examples have been adjusted to support that
>> > format here.
>>
>> I think this could use a bit more context.  I believe you're referring
>> to docs/sphinx/qmp_lexer.py.  It describes itself as "a Sphinx extension
>> that provides a QMP lexer for code blocks."
>>
>
> That's our guy! I explain its use a bit more in ... some other patch,
> somewhere...
>
>
>> "If we parse all examples as QMP" and "Once the QMP lexer is active for
>> examples" suggests we're *not* using it for (some?) examples.  So what
>> are we using it for?
>>
>
> My incremental backup doc makes use of it; you have to "opt in" to using
> the QMP lexer instead of the generic lexer.

The ".. code-block:: QMP" lines I can see in a few files?  Namely:

    docs/devel/s390-cpu-topology.rst
    docs/interop/bitmaps.rst
    docs/interop/qmp-spec.rst

> The example conversion patch later in this series opts all of the qapi docs
> into using it.
>
> ((Later, it's possible to make "Example::" choose the QMP lexer by default
> on any of our generated QMP pages. (and opting out would require explicit
> code-block syntax with the lexer of choice named.)))

The patch does two related things:

1. Fix invalid JSON.  Doesn't need justification.

2. Normalize elisions to ...  You pick ... because that's what
   qmp_lexer.py wants.

Doing both in one patch is fine.

Perhaps

    qapi: Fix invalid JSON in examples, and normalize elisions

    A few examples elide part of the output.  Normalize elision to
    exactly ...  Together with the JSON fixing, this enables use of
    docs/sphinx/qmp_lexer.py to highlight the examples in a later patch.

>> > Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>>
>> Patch looks lovely.
>>
>> Hat tip to Victor Toso, who fixed up most examples two years ago.  Back
>> then we couldn't decide how to do elisions, so we left some unfixed.
>>
>
> Sorry I didn't chime in back then! "..." is arbitrary, but it's what we
> already use for the qmp lexer and in the incremental backup/bitmap docs, so
> I figured consistency was good.

It is.

> The QMP lexer has syntax support for ->, <- and ... and otherwise requires
> the examples to be valid JSON. It doesn't understand grammar, though, so
> it's kind of "dumb", but this is one small protection.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]