[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated BGR vs. RGB vga patch...
From: |
malc |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated BGR vs. RGB vga patch... |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:08:32 +0400 (MSD) |
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Leonardo E. Reiter wrote:
Anyway, I didn't spend time figuring out how to query SDL for the ordering.
You still have to manually pass in -bgr. The good news is that all the
computation is now done at compile-time, with only very few tests done at
run-time. I agree with your assessment of compile-time versus run-time
options... I was merely suggesting a compromise to fend off the minor
performance hit of using the old patch. But the method you suggested is much
better and that's how it's implemented now.
I maybe going out on a limb here, but isn't rgb/bgr trivially deducible
from: sdl.c:screen->format->[RGBA]shift.
--
mailto:address@hidden
- [Qemu-devel] Updated BGR vs. RGB vga patch..., Leonardo E. Reiter, 2006/04/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated BGR vs. RGB vga patch..., Paul Brook, 2006/04/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated BGR vs. RGB vga patch..., Leonardo E. Reiter, 2006/04/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated BGR vs. RGB vga patch..., Paul Brook, 2006/04/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated BGR vs. RGB vga patch..., Leonardo E. Reiter, 2006/04/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated BGR vs. RGB vga patch..., Paul Brook, 2006/04/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated BGR vs. RGB vga patch..., Leonardo E. Reiter, 2006/04/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated BGR vs. RGB vga patch...,
malc <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated BGR vs. RGB vga patch..., Leonardo E. Reiter, 2006/04/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated BGR vs. RGB vga patch..., Leonardo E. Reiter, 2006/04/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated BGR vs. RGB vga patch..., Leonardo E. Reiter, 2006/04/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated BGR vs. RGB vga patch..., Leonardo E. Reiter, 2006/04/10
Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated BGR vs. RGB vga patch..., Thiemo Seufer, 2006/04/10